An assessment of the emissions inventory processing systems EMS-2001 and SMOKE in grid-based air quality models

被引:14
作者
Hogrefe, C
Sistla, G
Zalewsky, E
Hao, W
Ku, JY
机构
[1] New York State Dept Environm Conservat, Bur Air Qual Anal & Res, Albany, NY 12233 USA
[2] SUNY Albany, Atmospher Sci Res Ctr, Albany, NY 12222 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1080/10473289.2003.10466261
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In the United States, emission processing models such as Emissions Modeling System-2001 (EMS-2001), Emissions Preprocessor System-Version 2.5 (EPS2.5), and the Sparse Matrix Operator Kernel Emissions (SMOKE) model are currently being used to generate gridded, hourly, speciated emission inputs for urban and regional-scale photochemical models from aggregated pollutant inventories. In this study, two models, EMS-2001 and SMOKE, were applied with their default internal data sets to process a common inventory database for a high ozone (O-3) episode over the eastern United States using the Carbon Bond IV (CB4) chemical speciation mechanism. A comparison of the emissions processed by these systems shows differences in all three of the major processing steps performed by the two models (i.e., in temporal allocation, spatial allocation, and chemical speciation). Results from a simulation with a photochemical model using these two sets of emissions indicate differences on the order of +/-20 ppb in the predicted 1-hr daily maximum O-3 concentrations. It is therefore critical to develop and implement more common and synchronized temporal, spatial, and speciation cross-reference systems such that the processes within each emissions model converge toward reasonably similar results. This would also help to increase confidence in the validity of photochemical grid model results by reducing one aspect of modeling uncertainty.
引用
收藏
页码:1121 / 1129
页数:9
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
Byun D.W., 1999, EPA600R99030 OFF RES
[2]  
CAUSLEY MC, 1994, EMISSIONS PREPROCESS
[3]  
*ENV CORP, 2002, US GUID COMP AIR QUA
[4]   Quantification of variability and uncertainty in lawn and garden equipment NOx and total hydrocarbon emission factors [J].
Frey, HC ;
Bammi, S .
JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 2002, 52 (04) :435-448
[5]   Quantification of variability and uncertainty in air pollutant emission inventories:: Method and case study for utility NOx emissions [J].
Frey, HC ;
Zheng, JY .
JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 2002, 52 (09) :1083-1095
[6]   A PHOTOCHEMICAL KINETICS MECHANISM FOR URBAN AND REGIONAL SCALE COMPUTER MODELING [J].
GERY, MW ;
WHITTEN, GZ ;
KILLUS, JP ;
DODGE, MC .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1989, 94 (D10) :12925-12956
[7]  
GRELL GA, 1994, NCARTN398PLUSSTR
[8]   Uncertainties in predicted ozone concentrations due to input uncertainties for the UAM-V photochemical grid model applied to the July 1995 OTAG domain [J].
Hanna, SR ;
Lu, ZG ;
Frey, HC ;
Wheeler, N ;
Vukovich, J ;
Arunachalam, S ;
Fernau, M ;
Hansen, DA .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2001, 35 (05) :891-903
[9]  
Houyoux M., 2002, SPARSE MATRIX OPERAT
[10]   Emission inventory development and processing for the Seasonal Model for Regional Air Quality (SMRAQ) project [J].
Houyoux, MR ;
Vukovich, JM ;
Coats, CJ ;
Wheeler, NJM ;
Kasibhatla, PS .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2000, 105 (D7) :9079-9090