Waist circumference as a screening tool for cardiovascular risk factors: Evaluation of receiver operating characteristics (ROC)

被引:69
作者
Han, TS
vanLeer, EM
Seidell, JC
Lean, MEJ
机构
[1] UNIV GLASGOW, ROYAL INFIRM, DEPT HUMAN NUTR, GLASGOW G31 2ER, LANARK, SCOTLAND
[2] NATL INST PUBL HLTH & ENVIRONM PROTECT, DEPT CHRON DIS & ENVIRONM EPIDEMIOL, BILTHOVEN, NETHERLANDS
来源
OBESITY RESEARCH | 1996年 / 4卷 / 06期
关键词
epidemiology; fat distribution; health; obesity; weight management;
D O I
10.1002/j.1550-8528.1996.tb00267.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
To evaluate the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) to determine the cutoffs of waist circumference as a potential population directed screening tool for hypercholesterolaemia (greater than or equal to 6.5 mmol/L), low high density lipoprotein cholesterol (<0.9 mmol/L), and hypertension (treated and/or systolic greater than or equal to 160 and/or diastolic blood pressure greater than or equal to 95 mmHg), in 2183 men and 2698 women aged 20 to 59 years selected at random from Dutch civil registries. Main outcome measures: Height, weight, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, total plasma cholesterol and high density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations, and blood pressure. Results: ROC curves showed that sensitivity equalled specificity at waist circumferences between 93-95 cm in men and 81-84 cm in women for identifying individual risk factors, and 92 cm in men and 81 cm in women for identifying those with at least one risk factor. Sensitivity and specificity were equal at levels between 61% to 69% for identifying individual risk factors, with positive predictions (56.8% in men and 37.8% in women) within 2% of those using previously defined 'Action Level 1' of waist circumference 94 cm in men and 80 cm in women (58.8% in men and 37.4% in women), Risk prediction by anthropometric methods was relatively low: ROC areas for identifying each risk factor by waist varied from 55% to 60%, and reached about 65% for identifying at least one risk factor. Height accounted for less than 0.3% of variance in waist circumference. Using BMI at 25 kg/m(2) gave similar prediction to waist, but its combination with waist did not improve predictive values. Conclusions: Measurement of waist circumference 'Action Level 1' at 94 cm (37 inches) in men and 80 cm (32 inches) in women could be adopted as a simpler valid alternative to BMI for health promotion, to alert those at risk of cardiovascular disease, and as a guide to risk avoidance by self-weight management.
引用
收藏
页码:533 / 547
页数:15
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
Belsley DA, 1980, Regression diagnostics: Identifying influential data and sources of collinearity
[2]   OBESITY, FAT DISTRIBUTION, AND WEIGHT-GAIN AS RISK-FACTORS FOR CLINICAL DIABETES IN MEN [J].
CHAN, JM ;
RIMM, EB ;
COLDITZ, GA ;
STAMPFER, MJ ;
WILLETT, WC .
DIABETES CARE, 1994, 17 (09) :961-969
[3]   BODY-FAT DISTRIBUTION IN RELATION TO BREAST-CANCER IN WOMEN PARTICIPATING IN THE DOM-PROJECT [J].
DENTONKELAAR, I ;
SEIDELL, JC ;
COLLETTE, HJA .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 1995, 34 (01) :55-61
[4]   REGIONAL DISTRIBUTION OF BODY-FAT, PLASMA-LIPOPROTEINS, AND CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE [J].
DESPRES, JP ;
MOORJANI, S ;
LUPIEN, PJ ;
TREMBLAY, A ;
NADEAU, A ;
BOUCHARD, C .
ARTERIOSCLEROSIS, 1990, 10 (04) :497-511
[5]   MULTIVARIATE-ANALYSIS OF THE INSULIN-RESISTANCE SYNDROME IN WOMEN [J].
EDWARDS, KL ;
AUSTIN, MA ;
NEWMAN, B ;
MAYER, E ;
KRAUSS, RM ;
SELBY, JV .
ARTERIOSCLEROSIS AND THROMBOSIS, 1994, 14 (12) :1940-1945
[6]   PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY, OBESITY, AND RISK FOR COLON-CANCER AND ADENOMA IN MEN [J].
GIOVANNUCCI, E ;
ASCHERIO, A ;
RIMM, EB ;
COLDITZ, GA ;
STAMPFER, MJ ;
WILLETT, WC .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1995, 122 (05) :327-334
[7]  
Han TS, 1996, FASEB J, V10, P1207
[8]   WAIST CIRCUMFERENCE ACTION LEVELS IN THE IDENTIFICATION OF CARDIOVASCULAR RISK-FACTORS - PREVALENCE STUDY IN A RANDOM SAMPLE [J].
HAN, TS ;
VANLEER, EM ;
SEIDELL, JC ;
LEAN, MEJ .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 311 (7017) :1401-1405
[9]   THE MEANING AND USE OF THE AREA UNDER A RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC (ROC) CURVE [J].
HANLEY, JA ;
MCNEIL, BJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1982, 143 (01) :29-36
[10]  
KATTERMANN R, 1984, J CLIN CHEM CLIN BIO, V22, P245