Family reports of dying patients' distress: The adaptation of a research tool to assess global symptom distress in the last week of life

被引:42
作者
Hickman, SE
Tilden, VP
Tolle, SW
机构
[1] Oregon Hlth Sci Univ, Ctr Eth Hlth Care, SNORD, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[2] Oregon Hlth Sci Univ, Sch Nursing, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[3] Oregon Hlth Sci Univ, Sch Med, Div Gen Med, Portland, OR 97201 USA
关键词
dying; measurement; palliative care; terminal care; quality of care;
D O I
10.1016/S0885-3924(01)00299-8
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Understanding dying patients' symptom distress is an important component of efforts to improve care at the end of life. It can, however, be problematic to conduct research with dying patients. Family members can serve as sources of information about decendents' last days of life. In order to assess family reports of decedents' global symptom distress in the last week of life, we adapted the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale Global Distress Index (MSAS-GDI), a brief measure of patient global symptom distress, for use in a retrospective study of family reports about end-of-life care. It was administered to a sample of 103 family member to assess the psychometric properties of the instrument in bereaved family members. The Family MSAS-GDI consists of questions about 11 psychological and physical symptoms commonly experienced by dying patients. The majority of family members were able to respond to the scale items. The mean Family MSAS-GDI score was 1.14 (SD=0.87) with a range of 0 to 3.73. The scale demonstrated good internal consistency (alpha =0.82). The average item-total correlation was r=0.49 and the average inter-item correlation was r=0.30, suggesting items were moderately correlated with the overall total scale and with each other. The Family MSAS-GDI could prove to be a useful tool in assessing and tracking global symptom distress in dying patients. J Pain Symptom Manage 2001;22:565-574. (C) U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee, 2001.
引用
收藏
页码:565 / 574
页数:10
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   REGIONAL STUDY OF CARE FOR THE DYING - METHODS AND SAMPLE CHARACTERISTICS [J].
ADDINGTONHALL, J ;
MCCARTHY, M .
PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 1995, 9 (01) :27-35
[2]  
BROOK RH, 1979, OVERVIEW CONCEPTUALI, V7
[3]  
CHANG VT, 1997, P AN M AM SOC CLIN, V16, pA47
[4]   Extent and determinants of error in doctors' prognoses in terminally ill patients: prospective cohort study [J].
Christakis, NA ;
Lamont, EB .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 320 (7233) :469-472
[5]  
CONNILL C, 1997, J PAIN SYMPTOM MANAG, V14, P328
[6]   The symptom burden of seriously ill hospitalized patients [J].
Desbiens, NA ;
Mueller-Rizner, N ;
Connors, AF ;
Wenger, NS ;
Lynn, J .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 1999, 17 (04) :248-255
[7]   Barriers to better pain control in hospitalized patients [J].
Drayer, RA ;
Henderson, J ;
Reidenberg, M .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 1999, 17 (06) :434-440
[8]   Assistance from family members, friends, paid care givers, and volunteers in the care of terminally ill patients [J].
Emanuel, EJ ;
Fairclough, DL ;
Slutsman, J ;
Alpert, H ;
Baldwin, D ;
Emanuel, LL .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 341 (13) :956-963
[9]   USING PROXIES TO EVALUATE QUALITY OF LIFE - CAN THEY PROVIDE VALID INFORMATION ABOUT PATIENTS HEALTH-STATUS AND SATISFACTION WITH MEDICAL-CARE [J].
EPSTEIN, AM ;
HALL, JA ;
TOGNETTI, J ;
SON, LH ;
CONANT, L .
MEDICAL CARE, 1989, 27 (03) :S91-S98
[10]   Methodological challenges for measuring quality of care at the end of life [J].
Fowler, FJ ;
Coppola, KM ;
Teno, JM .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 1999, 17 (02) :114-119