Does Party Trump Ideology? Disentangling Party and Ideology in America

被引:233
作者
Barber, Michael [1 ]
Pope, Jeremy C. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Brigham Young Univ, Polit Sci, Provo, UT 84602 USA
[2] Brigham Young Univ, Ctr Study Elect & Democracy, Provo, UT 84602 USA
关键词
PARTISAN POLARIZATION; VOTING-BEHAVIOR; PUBLIC-OPINION; POLICY; ELITE; IDENTIFICATION; REPRESENTATION; SOPHISTICATION; INFORMATION; CONSTRAINT;
D O I
10.1017/S0003055418000795
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Are people conservative (liberal) because they are Republicans (Democrats)? Or is it the reverse: people are Republicans (Democrats) because they are conservatives (liberals)? Though much has been said about this long-standing question, it is difficult to test because the concepts are nearly impossible to disentangle in modern America. Ideology and partisanship are highly correlated, only growing more so over time. However, the election of President Trump presents a unique opportunity to disentangle party attachment from ideological commitment. Using a research design that employs actual "conservative" and "liberal" policy statements from President Trump, we find that low-knowledge respondents, strong Republicans, Trump-approving respondents, and self-described conservatives are the most likely to behave like party loyalists by accepting the Trump cue-in either a liberal or conservative direction. These results suggest that there are a large number of party loyalists in the United States, that their claims to being a self-defined conservative are suspect, and that group loyalty is the stronger motivator of opinion than are any ideological principles.
引用
收藏
页码:38 / 54
页数:17
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   The rise of negative partisanship and the nationalization of US elections in the 21st century [J].
Abramowitz, Alan I. ;
Webster, Steven .
ELECTORAL STUDIES, 2016, 41 :12-22
[2]  
Achen C. H., 2016, Democracy for realists
[3]   The Delegate Paradox: Why Polarized Politicians Can Represent Citizens Best [J].
Ahler, Douglas J. ;
Broockman, David E. .
JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 2018, 80 (04) :1117-1133
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2016, ASYMMETRIC POLITICS
[5]   The strength of issues: Using multiple measures to gauge preference stability, ideological constraint, and issue voting [J].
Ansolabehere, Stephen ;
Rodden, Jonathan ;
Snyder, James M., Jr. .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2008, 102 (02) :215-232
[6]  
Asch S. E., 1952, SOC PSYCHOL-GERMANY
[7]   Leapfrog Representation and Extremism: A Study of American Voters and Their Members in Congress [J].
Bafumi, Joseph ;
Herron, Michael C. .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2010, 104 (03) :519-542
[8]   Partisanship and voting behavior, 1952-1996 [J].
Bartels, LM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2000, 44 (01) :35-50
[9]   A Theory of Political Parties: Groups, Policy Demands and Nominations in American Politics [J].
Bawn, Kathleen ;
Cohen, Martin ;
Karol, David ;
Masket, Seth ;
Noel, Hans ;
Zaller, John .
PERSPECTIVES ON POLITICS, 2012, 10 (03) :571-597
[10]   The Influence of Partisan Motivated Reasoning on Public Opinion [J].
Bolsen, Toby ;
Druckman, James N. ;
Cook, Fay Lomax .
POLITICAL BEHAVIOR, 2014, 36 (02) :235-262