A randomised controlled trial of ursodeoxycholic acid and S-adenosyl-L-methionine in the treatment of gestational cholestasis

被引:84
作者
Roncaglia, N
Locatelli, A
Arreghini, A
Assi, F
Cameroni, I
Pezzullo, JC
Ghidini, A
机构
[1] Univ Milano Bicocca, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Monza, Italy
[2] Georgetown Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Pharmacol & Biostat, Washington, DC 20007 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1046/j.1471-0528.2003.00029.x
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 [妇产科学];
摘要
Objective To compare the efficacy of S-adenosyl-L-methionine and ursodeoxycholic acid in improving serum biochemical abnormalities in gestational cholestasis. Design Randomised clinical trial. Setting University hospital. Population All women at <36 weeks of gestation with severe gestational cholestasis during June 1996 to December 2001. Methods Enrolled women were randomly assigned oral S-adenosyl-L-methionine 500 mg twice daily or oral ursodeoxycholic acid 300 mg twice daily until delivery. Main outcome measures Reduction in the concentration of serum bile acids. Other variables considered included obstetric and neonatal outcome, clinical symptoms and other laboratory measurements (serum levels of transaminases and bilirubin). The two groups were compared using Student's t test, Wilcoxon's signed rank sum test and Fisher's exact test, with a two-tailed P < 0.05 being considered significant. Results Of the 46 women enrolled, 24 received ursodeoxycholic acid and 22 S-adenosyl-L-methionine. At enrolment, gestational age, duration of therapy, rate of nulliparity, pruritus score and biochemical characteristics were similar between the groups. Both therapies significantly and equally improved pruritus. Women receiving ursodeoxycholic acid had a significantly greater improvement in the concentration of serum bile acids (P = 0.001), aspartate aminotransferase (P = 0.01), alanine aminotransferase (<0.001) and bilirubin (P = 0.002) compared with those receiving S-adenosyl-L-methionine. Duration of therapy was significantly greater in women receiving ursodeoxycholic acid compared with S-adenosyl-L-methionine (P = 0.04), whereas gestational age at delivery and rate of prematurity were similar in the two groups. Conclusions In women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, ursodeoxycholic acid is more effective than S-adenosyl-L-methionine at improving the concentration of serum bile acids and other tests of liver function, whereas both therapies are equally effective at improving pruritus.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 21
页数:5
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 2001, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, DOI [DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD000493, DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD000493]]
[2]
CHOLESTASIS OF PREGNANCY - CLINICAL AND LABORATORY STUDIES [J].
BERG, B ;
HELM, G ;
PETERSOHN, L ;
TRYDING, N .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1986, 65 (02) :107-113
[3]
Ursodeoxycholic acid therapy in pregnant women with cholestasis [J].
Diaferia, A ;
Nicastri, PL ;
Tartagni, M ;
Loizzi, P ;
Iacovizzi, C ;
DiLeo, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 1996, 52 (02) :133-140
[4]
S-adenosylmethionine versus ursodeoxycholic acid in the treatment of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: Preliminary results of a controlled trial [J].
Floreani, A ;
Paternoster, D ;
Melis, A ;
Grella, PV .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 1996, 67 (02) :109-113
[5]
URSODEOXYCHOLIC ACID IN INTRAHEPATIC CHOLESTASIS OF PREGNANCY [J].
FLOREANI, A ;
PATERNOSTER, D ;
GRELLA, V ;
SACCO, S ;
GANGEMI, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1994, 101 (01) :64-65
[6]
FREZZA M, 1990, HEPATO-GASTROENTEROL, V37, P122
[7]
Kafkasli A, 1997, J Matern Fetal Med, V6, P356
[8]
MATERNAL SERUM BILE-ACID LEVELS AND FETAL DISTRESS IN CHOLESTASIS OF PREGNANCY [J].
LAATIKAINEN, T ;
TULENHEIMO, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 1984, 22 (02) :91-94
[9]
MENT LJ, 1997, J HEPATOL, V27, P1029
[10]
A randomised placebo-controlled trial of ursodeoxycholic acid and S-adenosylmethionine in the treatment of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy [J].
Nicastri, PL ;
Diaferia, A ;
Tartagni, N ;
Loizzi, P ;
Fanelli, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1998, 105 (11) :1205-1207