Ecosystem subsidies to Swedish food consumption from 1962 to 1994

被引:17
作者
Deutsch, L [1 ]
Folke, C
机构
[1] Univ Stockholm, Natl Resources Management, Dept Syst Ecol, S-10691 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Univ Stockholm, Ctr Res Nat Resources & Environm, S-10691 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
agriculture; food consumption; agricultural intensification; ecosystem performance; vulnerability; ecological footprint;
D O I
10.1007/s10021-005-0035-4
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Analysis of food consumption and agricultural production trends in Sweden has focused on domestic food production levels and yields, overlooking human dependence on ecosystem support. We estimate the ecosystem areas appropriated (ArEAs) for agricultural production (crop and animal feed production and grazing in arable land and marine production for fishmeal used in animal feed) to satisfy Swedish food consumption needs from 1962 to 1994. The total agroecosystem areas worldwide supporting Swedish food consumption (that is, domestic production less exports plus imports) have declined by almost one-third since the 1960s as a result of consumption changes and agricultural intensification. By 1994, Swedish consumption of domestic food crops was halved and consumers relied on agricultural areas outside Sweden to satisfy more than a third (35%) of food consumption needs. Surprisingly, 74% of manufactured animal feed ArEAs were from imported inputs. Moreover, marine ArEAs equal to 12% of the total appropriated areas were needed to support fishmeal usage in animal feed. The results show that domestic agricultural areas do not support Swedish food consumption and that the bulk of manufactured feed used in animal products' production in Sweden is supplied by ecosystems of other nations. These are hidden subsidies of nature, not explicit in Swedish national agricultural policy. Sweden must recognize its high level of dependence on the capacity of ecosystems of other nations to supply its food needs. Ignorance of ecosystem support may increase vulnerability.
引用
收藏
页码:512 / 528
页数:17
相关论文
共 76 条
[41]  
HESSEL K, 1997, RESULTAT FRAN MONITO, V42
[42]   Linking freshwater flows and ecosystem services appropriated by people:: The case of the Baltic Sea drainage basin [J].
Jansson, Å ;
Folke, C ;
Rockström, J ;
Gordon, L .
ECOSYSTEMS, 1999, 2 (04) :351-366
[43]   Quantifying the nitrogen retention capacity of natural wetlands in the large-scale drainage basin of the Baltic Sea [J].
Jansson, Å ;
Folke, C ;
Langaas, S .
LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 1998, 13 (04) :249-262
[44]  
JANSSON AM, 1978, 28 SWED NAT SCI RES
[45]   ECOLOGICAL LIMITATIONS AND APPROPRIATION OF ECOSYSTEM SUPPORT BY SHRIMP FARMING IN COLOMBIA [J].
LARSSON, J ;
FOLKE, C ;
KAUTSKY, N .
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1994, 18 (05) :663-676
[46]  
LARSSON U, 1985, AMBIO, V14, P9
[47]  
Lebel L, 2002, AMBIO, V31, P311, DOI 10.1639/0044-7447(2002)031[0311:ITASAI]2.0.CO
[48]  
2
[49]   A modified ecological footprint method and its application to Australia [J].
Lenzen, M ;
Murray, SA .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2001, 37 (02) :229-255
[50]   Agricultural intensification and ecosystem properties [J].
Matson, PA ;
Parton, WJ ;
Power, AG ;
Swift, MJ .
SCIENCE, 1997, 277 (5325) :504-509