Efficacy of a bivalent vaccine against eel diseases caused by Vibrio vulnificus after its administration by four different routes

被引:46
作者
Esteve-Gassent, MD
Fouz, B
Amaro, C
机构
[1] Univ Valencia, Fac Biol, Dept Microbiol & Ecol, Burjassot 46100, Spain
[2] Valenciana Acuicultura SA, Valencia, Spain
关键词
Vibrio vulnificus; eel; mucosal immunity; fish vaccines; oral vaccination; anal intubation; immersion vaccination; Vibrio vaccines; biotype; 2; serovar E; serovar A; humoral immunity;
D O I
10.1016/S1050-4648(03)00036-6
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
Vulnivaccine, a vaccine against vibriosis caused by Vibrio vulnificus serovar E (formerly biotype 2), confers acceptable levels of protection to eels after its administration by prolonged immersion in three doses. Recently, a new pathogenic serovar.. named serovar A, has been isolated from vaccinated eels in a Spanish freshwater eel farm. The main objective of this work was to design a bivalent vaccine, and to study its effectiveness against the two pathogenic serovars. With this aim, eels weighing around 20 g were immunised with the bivalent vaccine by oral and anal intubation. intraperitoneal injection (i.p.) and prolonged immersion. The overall results indicated that: (i) the new vaccine delivered by oral and anal intubation induced protection levels higher than 80%, to that achieved after i.p. vaccination, (ii) oral and anal vaccination induced a significant systemic and mucosal immune response; (iii) the protection after vaccination by whichever routes was related to antibody titres in plasma, (iv) mucosal and systemic compartments showed different kinetics of antibody production; (v) evidence for passive transfer of antibodies from plasma to gut mucus were found after i.p. and anal vaccination, and finally, (vi) vaccination did not enhance the production of lysozyme, in plasma or mucus. In conclusion, this new vaccine is effective in protecting eels against vibriosis caused by the two eel-pathogenic serovars of V. vulnificus, the oral delivery system is a promising way which may be used in intensive culture facilities during the whole growth period of eels. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 105
页数:13
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   ELECTROPHORETIC ANALYSIS OF HETEROGENEOUS LIPOPOLYSACCHARIDES FROM VARIOUS STRAINS OF VIBRIO-VULNIFICUS BIOTYPE-1 AND BIOTYPE-2 BY SILVER STAINING AND IMMUNOBLOTTING [J].
AMARO, C ;
BIOSCA, EG ;
FOUZ, B ;
GARAY, E .
CURRENT MICROBIOLOGY, 1992, 25 (02) :99-104
[2]   EVIDENCE THAT WATER TRANSMITS VIBRIO-VULNIFICUS BIOTYPE-2 INFECTIONS TO EELS [J].
AMARO, C ;
BIOSCA, EG ;
FOUZ, B ;
ALCAIDE, E ;
ESTEVE, C .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1995, 61 (03) :1133-1137
[3]   The lipopolysaccharide O side chain of Vibrio vulnificus serogroup E is a virulence determinant for eels [J].
Amaro, C ;
Fouz, B ;
Biosca, EG ;
MarcoNoales, E ;
Collado, R .
INFECTION AND IMMUNITY, 1997, 65 (06) :2475-2479
[4]  
Amend D.F., 1981, DEV BIOL STAND, V49, P447, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1749-7345.1983.TB00082.X
[5]  
Austin B., 1993, BACTERIOLOGICAL FISH, V2nd, P265
[6]   Biofilm vaccine of Aeromonas hydrophila standardization of dose and duration for oral vaccination of carps [J].
Azad, IS ;
Shankar, KM ;
Mohan, CV ;
Kalita, B .
FISH & SHELLFISH IMMUNOLOGY, 1999, 9 (07) :519-528
[7]   Uptake and processing of biofilm and free-cell vaccines of Aeromonas hydrophila in Indian major carps and common carp following oral vaccination -: antigen localization by a monoclonal antibody [J].
Azad, IS ;
Shankar, KM ;
Mohan, CV ;
Kalita, B .
DISEASES OF AQUATIC ORGANISMS, 2000, 43 (02) :103-108
[8]  
BIOSCA EG, 1994, THESIS U VALENCIA
[9]   Efficacy of different administration routes for vaccination against Vibrio anguillarum in Atlantic halibut (Hippoglossus hippoglossus L.) [J].
Bowden, TJ ;
Menoyo-Luque, D ;
Bricknell, IR ;
Wergeland, H .
FISH & SHELLFISH IMMUNOLOGY, 2002, 12 (03) :283-285
[10]   AFFINITY PURIFICATION OF ANTIGEN-SPECIFIC SERUM IMMUNOGLOBULIN FROM THE EUROPEAN EEL (ANGUILLA-ANGUILLA) [J].
BUCHMANN, K ;
OSTERGAARD, L ;
GLAMANN, J .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY, 1992, 36 (01) :89-97