Global technology policies for economic growth

被引:25
作者
Mitchell, GR [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Wharton Program Technol Innovat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0040-1625(98)00044-4
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
With the end of the Cold War, nations throughout the world are placing ever greater emphasis on economic growth. Over the last 50 years, advances in technology have been the single most important factor in creating growth in many economies, and thus policies to promote technological innovation rank high on the list of priorities for both developed and developing countries. In general, as countries progress up the economic ladder, national R&D intensity, (i.e., R&D/GDP), tends to increase along with per capita income. In addition, nations move through a discernible sequence of technology policies from an initial focus on infrastructure, through a set of actions designed to encourage technology acquisition from more advanced economies, to comprehensive education and research agendas targeted to the creation and development of new technology. In the United States, national technology policy for economic growth focuses on education, building a 21st century infrastructure, and creating a business climate that encourages growth, technological innovation, and risk taking. Throughout the last 50 years there have been significant changes in the competitive position of nations. In recent years, U.S. corporations have regained some of the competitive leadership they lost in the 1980s. This has been accompanied by significantly increased R&D spending by U.S. industry, particularly in the information and health care related sectors. U.S. industry funding of R&D overtook that from the government in the early 1980s and accounts for almost two-thirds of the national total. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:205 / 214
页数:10
相关论文
共 7 条
  • [1] BOSKIN MJ, 1992, TECHNOLOGY WEALTH NA
  • [2] *NAT SCI TECHN COU, 1996, TECHN NAT INT
  • [3] Quinn JamesB., 1992, Intelligent Enterprise: A Knowledge and Service Based Paradigm for Industr
  • [4] *US DEP COMM, 1996, M CHALL US IND FAC 2
  • [5] *US DEP COMM, 1997, M CHALL US IND FAC 2
  • [6] *US DEP COMM, 1997, KOR STRAT LEAD RES D
  • [7] 1994, EC REPORT PRESIDENT