Latent Markov modeling applied to grant peer review

被引:12
作者
Bornmann, Lutz [1 ]
Mutz, Ruediger [1 ]
Daniel, Hans-Dieter [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] ETH, Professorship Social Psychol & Res Higher Educ, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Zurich, Evaluat Off, CH-8006 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
latent Markov model; latent class analysis; peer review; multi-stage evaluation process; reliability;
D O I
10.1016/j.joi.2008.05.003
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
In the grant peer review process we can distinguish various evaluation stages in which assessors judge applications on a rating scale. Research on the grant peer review process that considers its multi-stage character scarcely exists. In this study we analyze 1954 applications for doctoral and post-doctoral fellowships from the Boehringer Ingelheim Fonds (B.I.F.), which are evaluated in three stages (first: evaluation by an external reviewer; second: internal evaluation by a staff member; third:final decision by the B. I. F. Board of Trustees). The results of a latent Markov model ( in combination with latent class analysis) show that a fellowship application has a chance of approval only if it is recommended for support already in the first evaluation stage, that is, if the external reviewer's evaluation is positive. Based on these results, a form of triage or pre-screening of applications seems desirable. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:217 / 228
页数:12
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
Agresti A, 2002, CATEGORICAL DATA ANA, P455
[2]  
[Anonymous], LATENT VARIABLES ANA
[3]  
[Anonymous], PEER REV PRACT FED S
[4]   Criteria used by a peer review committee for selection of research fellows - A boolean probit analysis [J].
Bornmann, L ;
Daniel, HD .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SELECTION AND ASSESSMENT, 2005, 13 (04) :296-303
[5]   Committee peer review at an international research foundation: predictive validity and fairness of selection decisions on post-graduate fellowship applications [J].
Bornmann, L ;
Daniel, HD .
RESEARCH EVALUATION, 2005, 14 (01) :15-20
[6]   Selection of research fellowship recipients by committee peer review. Reliability, fairness and predictive validity of Board of Trustees' decisions [J].
Bornmann, L ;
Daniel, HD .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2005, 63 (02) :297-320
[7]   Convergent validation of peer review decisions using the h index -: Extent of and reasons for type I and type II errors [J].
Bornmann, Lutz ;
Daniel, Hans-Dieter .
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2007, 1 (03) :204-213
[8]   Row-column (RC) association model applied to grant peer review [J].
Bornmann, Lutz ;
Mutz, Ruediger ;
Daniel, Hans-Dieter .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2007, 73 (02) :139-147
[9]   Gatekeepers of science - Effects of external reviewers' attributes on the assessments of fellowship applications [J].
Bornmann, Lutz ;
Daniel, Hans-Dieter .
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2007, 1 (01) :83-91
[10]   Potential sources of bias in research fellowship assessments: effects of university prestige and field of study [J].
Bornmann, Lutz ;
Daniel, Hans-Dieter .
RESEARCH EVALUATION, 2006, 15 (03) :209-219