Stimulant-induced adaptations in neostriatal matrix and striosome systems: Transiting from instrumental responding to habitual behavior in drug addiction

被引:75
作者
Canales, JJ
机构
[1] Univ Valencia, Cavanilles Inst Biodivers & Dev Biol, Neurobiol Unit, Valencia 46980, Spain
[2] Univ Cardenal Herrera, CEU, Inst Invest Drogas & Conductas Adict, IDYCA, Valencia 46980, Spain
关键词
habit; addiction; basal ganglia; matrix; striosomes; neocortex; dopamine;
D O I
10.1016/j.nlm.2004.10.006
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Converging evidence indicates that repeated exposure to motor stimulants such as cocaine and amphetamine produces marked alterations in network responsiveness of striatal neurons to subsequent challenge with the same stimulant drug. Such alterations, which correlate with persistent patterns of repetitive behavior, associate with distinct compartmental changes in the neostriatum. Striatal matrix system neurons undergo "silencing" following repeated drug challenges, allowing striosome system neurons to exhibit preferential activation. Matrix neurons are innervated by sensory and motor areas of neocortex and are activated in the course of ongoing, adaptive behavior. Inactivation of matrix neurons by chronic stimulant exposure may therefore constrain sensorimotor and cognitive processing. In turn, the striosomes are anatomically connected through re-entrant loops with limbic prefrontal and allocortical structures, such as anterior cingulate cortex, orbital frontal cortex, and basolateral amygdala, all of which play a part in stimulant-induced reinforcement and relapse to drug-taking. Moreover, functional evidence links striosome system neurons, which are responsible for providing inhibitory regulatory feedback to midbrain dopamine neurons, with reinforcement-based processes. In considering such evidence, we postulate that recurrent matrix inactivation and recruitment of striosome-based pathways by chronic stimulant exposure represent neural end-points of the transit from action-outcome associative behavior to conditioned habitual responding. Within this theoretical framework, habitual behavior can be elicited by both interoceptive cues and exteroceptive conditioned stimuli to promote the automatic execution of learned responses. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 103
页数:11
相关论文
共 88 条
[1]   Nucleus accumbens dopamine depletions make rats more sensitive to high ratio requirements but do not impair primary food reinforcement [J].
Aberman, JE ;
Salamone, JD .
NEUROSCIENCE, 1999, 92 (02) :545-552
[2]   FUNCTIONAL ARCHITECTURE OF BASAL GANGLIA CIRCUITS - NEURAL SUBSTRATES OF PARALLEL PROCESSING [J].
ALEXANDER, GE ;
CRUTCHER, MD .
TRENDS IN NEUROSCIENCES, 1990, 13 (07) :266-271
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1984, Neurobiology of learning and memory, DOI DOI 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0840-16.2016
[4]   Goal-directed instrumental action: contingency and incentive learning and their cortical substrates [J].
Balleine, BW ;
Dickinson, A .
NEUROPHARMACOLOGY, 1998, 37 (4-5) :407-419
[5]   NEUROGENETIC PATTERNS IN THE MEDIAL LIMBIC CORTEX OF THE RAT RELATED TO ANATOMICAL CONNECTIONS WITH THE THALAMUS AND STRIATUM [J].
BAYER, SA .
EXPERIMENTAL NEUROLOGY, 1990, 107 (02) :132-142
[6]   Addiction, dopamine, and the molecular mechanisms of memory [J].
Berke, JD ;
Hyman, SE .
NEURON, 2000, 25 (03) :515-532
[7]   Synaptic organisation of the basal ganglia [J].
Bolam, JP ;
Hanley, JJ ;
Booth, PAC ;
Bevan, MD .
JOURNAL OF ANATOMY, 2000, 196 :527-542
[8]   Acute effects of cocaine on human brain activity and emotion [J].
Breiter, HC ;
Gollub, RL ;
Weisskoff, RM ;
Kennedy, DN ;
Makris, N ;
Berke, JD ;
Goodman, JM ;
Kantor, HL ;
Gastfriend, DR ;
Riorden, JP ;
Mathew, RT ;
Rosen, BR ;
Hyman, SE .
NEURON, 1997, 19 (03) :591-611
[9]  
Brown J, 1999, J NEUROSCI, V19, P10502
[10]   Differential metabolic activity in the striosome and matrix compartments of the rat striatum during natural behaviors [J].
Brown, LL ;
Feldman, SM ;
Smith, DM ;
Cavanaugh, JR ;
Ackermann, RF ;
Graybiel, AM .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2002, 22 (01) :305-314