Using the GAF as a national mental health outcome measure in the Department of Veterans Affairs

被引:45
作者
Greenberg, GA [1 ]
Rosenheck, RA
机构
[1] VAMC, NE Program Evaluat Ctr, Dept Vet Affairs, West Haven, CT 06515 USA
[2] Yale Univ, Dept Psychiat, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1176/appi.ps.56.4.420
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Data from the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) were used to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF), a single-item mental health status measure, as an outcome measure for large mental health care systems. Methods: The sample consisted of VHA mental health patients who had at least two GAF scores 45 days apart in 2002 (N = 283,754). First, to evaluate the discriminant validity of the GAF change measures, the authors examined the association of these measures with sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. Facility-level risk-adjusted measures of GAF change were then created in three different clinical samples at more than 130 VHA medical centers, adjusting for patients' sociodemographic characteristics and diagnoses. The internal consistency of the scale created by using these items and their consistency across medical centers over time was evaluated. Results: The analysis supported the discriminant validity of the GAF-derived measures. As expected, veterans who had a diagnosis of schizophrenia or Alzheimer's disease or who had service-connected disability ratings above 50 percent had lower baseline GAF scores and showed less improvement. The overall GAF performance measure had a high level of internal consistency ( a standardized alpha of .85) and was highly consistent across facilities over time. Conclusions: The results of this study provide preliminary empirical support for cautious use of a GAF-derived scale in monitoring changes in average facility-level outcomes over time. However, because of the potential for gaming of the measures and uncontrolled variation in the scale's administration across facilities, the scale should not be used to compare outcomes across facilities.
引用
收藏
页码:420 / 426
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
American Psychiatric Association Task Force for the Handbook of Psychiatric Measures, 2000, HDB PSYCH MEAS
[2]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1980, Exploration in quality assessment and monitoring Vol. 1: The definition of quality and approaches to its assessment
[4]   Defining quality of care [J].
Campbell, SM ;
Roland, MO ;
Buetow, SA .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2000, 51 (11) :1611-1625
[5]   The effect of reforms on spending for veterans' substance abuse treatment, 1993-1999 [J].
Chen, S ;
Wagner, TH ;
Barnett, PG .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2001, 20 (04) :169-175
[6]   Large data sets can be dangerous! [J].
Drake, RE ;
McHugo, GJ .
PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES, 2003, 54 (02) :133-133
[7]   Clinical status - Charting for outcomes in behavioral health [J].
Eisen, SV .
PSYCHIATRIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2000, 23 (02) :347-+
[8]  
ENDICOTT J, 1976, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V33, P766
[9]  
GOLDMAN HH, 1992, AM J PSYCHIAT, V149, P1148
[10]   Costs and use of mental health services before and after managed care [J].
Goldman, W ;
McCulloch, J ;
Sturm, R .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 1998, 17 (02) :40-52