Schedule-dependent effects of haloperidol and amphetamine: multiple-schedule task shows within-subject effects

被引:30
作者
Caul, WF [1 ]
Brindle, NA [1 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Psychol, Nashville, TN 37240 USA
关键词
amphetamine; haloperidol; continuous reinforcement; progressive ratio; multiple schedule; schedules of reinforcement;
D O I
10.1016/S0091-3057(00)00431-7
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
A two-lever, multiple-schedule task was used to evaluate the effects of haloperidol (HA) and amphetamine (AM) on responding controlled by continuous reinforcement (CRF) and progressive ratio (PR) schedules of reinforcement. Rats were trained to press one lever for food delivered on a CRF schedule and the other lever for food delivered on a PR schedule. The operative schedule was signaled by the illumination of a cuelight mounted above the appropriate lever. Following 30 sessions of training, dose - response functions were determined for HA (0.0075, 0.015, 0.03, and 0.06 mg/kg) and AM (0.0625, 0.125, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, and 1.00 mg/kg). Both drugs produced dose- and schedule-dependent effects. For example. administration of 0.03 mg;kg HA did not affect responding under the CW schedule but did reduce responding during PR components, whereas administration of 0.06 mg/kg reduced responding under both schedules of reinforcement. Some doses of AM produced increased responding under the CRF schedule and, within the same session, decreased responding under the PR schedule. The results with HA are consistent with the view that interfering with dopaminergic function affects the allocation and maintenance of responding and that this effect depends on properties of the schedule of reinforcement. The results with AM emphasize that statements about the effects of the drug on positively reinforced behavior cannot be made without reference to specific schedules of reinforcement. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:53 / 63
页数:11
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Nucleus accumbens dopamine depletions make rats more sensitive to high ratio requirements but do not impair primary food reinforcement [J].
Aberman, JE ;
Salamone, JD .
NEUROSCIENCE, 1999, 92 (02) :545-552
[2]   Effects of dopamine antagonists and accumbens dopamine depletions on time-constrained progressive-ratio performance [J].
Aberman, JE ;
Ward, SJ ;
Salamone, JD .
PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR, 1998, 61 (04) :341-348
[3]  
Barrett J. E., 1981, ADV BEHAV PHARMACOL, V3, P119
[4]  
BERRIDGE C, 1996, NEUROSCI BIOBEHAV R, V20, P1
[5]   What is the role of dopamine in reward: hedonic impact, reward learning, or incentive salience? [J].
Berridge, KC ;
Robinson, TE .
BRAIN RESEARCH REVIEWS, 1998, 28 (03) :309-369
[6]   EFFECTS OF MESOLIMBIC DOPAMINE DEPLETION ON RESPONDING MAINTAINED BY COCAINE AND FOOD [J].
CAINE, SB ;
KOOB, GF .
JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 1994, 61 (02) :213-221
[7]   NUCLEUS-ACCUMBENS DOPAMINE DEPLETIONS IN RATS AFFECT RELATIVE RESPONSE ALLOCATION IN A NOVEL COST/BENEFIT PROCEDURE [J].
COUSINS, MS ;
SALAMONE, JD .
PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR, 1994, 49 (01) :85-91
[8]   PHARMACOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF PERFORMANCE ON A CONCURRENT LEVER PRESSING FEEDING CHOICE PROCEDURE - EFFECTS OF DOPAMINE ANTAGONIST, CHOLINOMIMETIC, SEDATIVE AND STIMULANT-DRUGS [J].
COUSINS, MS ;
WEI, W ;
SALAMONE, JD .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1994, 116 (04) :529-537
[9]  
DEWS PB, 1977, HDB PSYCHOPHARMACOLO, V7, P107
[10]  
EGLI M, 1992, BEHAV PHARMACOL, V3, P581