Diversity and equity

被引:27
作者
Berry, John [1 ]
机构
[1] Queens Univ, Dept Psychol, Kingston, ON, Canada
基金
俄罗斯科学基金会;
关键词
Policy; Ideology; Integration/multiculturalism; Assimilation/melting pot; Marginalisation/exclusion; Separation/segregation; CULTURAL-DIVERSITY; ETHNIC DIVERSITY; COLOR-BLINDNESS; ANTI-IMMIGRANT; MULTICULTURALISM; ACCULTURATION; ATTITUDES; POLICY; METAANALYSIS; PERCEPTIONS;
D O I
10.1108/CCSM-03-2016-0085
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to describe and analyse two features of multicultural societies: diversity and equity. The author argues that both these features are necessary for multicultural societies and their institutions to be successful. Diversity is understood to include variations in culture, ethnicity, religion, age, gender and sexual orientation. Equity is understood to include inclusive participation and the removal of barriers to such participation. Diversity without the opportunity for equitable participation can lead to a form of separation; equity without diversity can lead to a form of assimilation; the absence of both can lead to marginalisation; and the presence of both can lead to a full integration. Design/methodology/approach - This is a conceptual paper with a focus on better understanding of how to manage multicultural societies and institutions. Findings - The author distinguishes between three meanings of multiculturalism; as demography; as policy; and as ideology. He proposes a conceptual framework to illustrate the various ways in which intercultural relations may take place at three levels (society, institutions and individual), and with two kinds of groups (dominant and non-dominant). An analysis of multiculturalism policy in Canada and internationally reveals three principles needed for success in such societies: the multiculturalism principle; the integration principle; and the contact principle. Research limitations/implications - The use of these concepts for better management of intercultural relations in multicultural societies and institutions through mutual adaptation is proposed. Originality/value - With much debate and confusion about the meaning and value of multiculturalism, this paper has sought to clarify many of the concepts and distinctions.
引用
收藏
页码:413 / 430
页数:18
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]   Fractionalization [J].
Alesina, A ;
Devleeschauwer, A ;
Easterly, W ;
Kurlat, S ;
Wacziarg, R .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC GROWTH, 2003, 8 (02) :155-194
[2]  
Algan Y., 2010, 5185 IZA
[3]  
Ambady N., 2013, EUROPEAN J SOCIAL PS, V25, P344
[4]  
[Anonymous], 4 INT AS HLTH WELL B
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2006, IMMIGRANT YOUTH CULT
[6]   Racial Color Blindness: Emergence, Practice, and Implications [J].
Apfelbaum, Evan P. ;
Norton, Michael I. ;
Sommers, Samuel R. .
CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2012, 21 (03) :205-209
[7]   Multiculturalism and acculturation:: Views of Dutch and Turkish-Dutch [J].
Arends-Tóth, J ;
Van de Vijver, FJR .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 33 (02) :249-266
[8]  
Banting K., 2006, The multicultural policy index
[9]   Is there really a retreat from multiculturalism policies? New evidence from the multiculturalism policy index [J].
Banting, Keith ;
Kymlicka, Will .
COMPARATIVE EUROPEAN POLITICS, 2013, 11 (05) :577-598
[10]  
Berry J.W., 1974, Topics in Culture learning, V2, P17