Attentional effects of nicotine and amphetamine in rats at different levels of motivation

被引:47
作者
Bizarro, L [1 ]
Stolerman, IP [1 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, Inst Psychiat P049, Sect Behav Pharmacol, London SE5 8AF, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
nicotine; amphetamine; attention; motivation; food deprivation; serial reaction time task; rats;
D O I
10.1007/s00213-003-1543-6
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Rationale: The effects of drugs on performance of tasks used to assess attention might be confounded with changes in motivation. Few studies have investigated the role of motivational factors in such situations. Objectives: To determine how changes in motivation for food influence performance of the 5-choice serial reaction time task and whether the effects of nicotine and amphetamine can be explained by motivational changes. Methods: Male hooded Lister rats were trained to respond to a 1-s light stimulus presented randomly in one of five apertures in order to obtain food reinforcers. For three groups of rats (n=9-10), access to food was restricted to maintain body weights at 80, 90 or 95% of control weights. Saline and nicotine (0.025-0.2 mg/kg) were tested in each group, with and without pre-feeding (5 g). In a second experiment, saline and amphetamine (0.03-0.9 mg/kg s.c.) were tested without pre-feeding. Results: High levels of motivation for food were associated with increases in anticipatory responses, fewer omission errors, shorter response latencies and completion of more trials, without change in accuracy. Nicotine, but not amphetamine, increased accuracy and the number of trials completed; whereas amphetamine, but not nicotine, increased omission errors. Both drugs decreased anticipatory responding at the largest doses tested. There were few interactions of motivational level with drug effects. Conclusions: The improvements in performance produced by nicotine did not resemble the effect of increased motivation, but some effects of amphetamine resembled those of reducing the level of motivation for food. Motivational levels did not confound assessments of the attentional effects of the drugs in terms of response accuracy.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 277
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], ADV BEHAV PHARM
[2]   ENHANCEMENT OF AMPHETAMINE ANOREXIA AFTER CHRONIC ADMINISTRATION OF SULPIRIDE IN RATS [J].
BAPTISTA, T ;
TENEUD, L ;
HERNANDEZ, L .
PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR, 1993, 45 (01) :45-49
[3]  
Bizarro L., 2001, BEHAV PHARMACOL, V12, pS9
[4]   The effect of repeated nicotine administration on the performance of drug-naive rats in a five-choice serial reaction time task [J].
Blondel, A ;
Simon, H ;
Sanger, DJ ;
Moser, P .
BEHAVIOURAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1999, 10 (6-7) :665-673
[5]   Characterisation of the effects of nicotine in the five-choice serial reaction time task in rats: antagonist studies [J].
Blondel, A ;
Sanger, DJ ;
Moser, PC .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2000, 149 (03) :293-305
[6]  
Bushnell Philip J., 2000, Neurotoxicology and Teratology, V22, P487, DOI 10.1016/S0892-0362(00)00077-5
[7]   Behavioral approaches to the assessment of attention in animals [J].
Bushnell, PJ .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1998, 138 (3-4) :231-259
[8]  
CABEZA DV, 1998, J NEUROSCI, V18, P7502
[9]   POTENTIATION OF AMPHETAMINE-INDUCED AROUSAL BY STARVATION [J].
CAMPBELL, BA ;
FIBIGER, HC .
NATURE, 1971, 233 (5319) :424-&
[10]   SEROTONIN2 RECEPTOR AGONISTS AND SEROTONERGIC ANORECTIC DRUGS AFFECT RATS PERFORMANCE DIFFERENTLY IN A 5-CHOICE SERIAL REACTION-TIME-TASK [J].
CARLI, M ;
SAMANIN, R .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1992, 106 (02) :228-234