A Two-Tier Matrix Game Approach for Obtaining Joint Bidding Strategies in FTR and Energy Markets

被引:8
作者
Babayigit, Cihan [1 ]
Rocha, Patricio [2 ]
Das, Tapas K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Revenue Management Solut LLC, Tampa, FL 33602 USA
[2] Univ S Florida, Dept Ind & Management Syst Engn, Tampa, FL 33620 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Energy settlement; financial transmission rights (FTRs); FTR settlement; matrix game; Nash equilibrium; restructured electricity markets; value iteration based reinforcement learning; TRANSMISSION RIGHTS; POWER; AUCTION; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1109/TPWRS.2010.2041076
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Transmission congestion results in revenue collected from the loads that often exceeds the payment made to the generators. The financial transmission right (FTR) is an instrument that allows the independent system operator (ISO) to redistribute the excess revenue (congestion charge) among the market participants. Generators and loads hold FTRs to hedge against congestion charges. Since the revenues from the FTR and energy markets are interdependent, each generator and load must have a joint bidding strategy for FTR and energy markets to maximize its total payoff. This paper presents a two-tier matrix game model that allows the generators and loads to obtain joint bidding strategies. The model also allows the ISOs and the market designers to assess the impact of various network configurations and rules on market performance (e. g., market power). The two-tier model considers multiple participants, multidimensional bid vectors, network contingencies, and varying demand. We conducted a numerical validation of our model by analyzing the three-node network studied by Joskow and Tirole (2000). Additional numerical studies were conducted on a five-node network to examine the impact of holding FTRs on the bidding strategies in the energy market and joint payoffs of the participants.
引用
收藏
页码:1211 / 1219
页数:9
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Power generation, operation, and control
[2]  
ARTHUR WB, 2005, AGENT BASED COMPUTAT, V2
[3]   Screening and mitigation of exacerbated market power due to Financial Transmission Rights [J].
Bautista, G ;
Quintana, VH .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2005, 20 (01) :213-222
[4]  
Berry C. A., 1999, Utilities Policy, V8, P139, DOI 10.1016/S0957-1787(99)00016-8
[5]  
BUSHNELL J, 1998, UNPUB
[6]   A study of basic bidding strategy in clearing pricing auctions [J].
Hao, SY .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2000, 15 (03) :975-980
[7]   Strategic gaming analysis for electric power systems: An MPEC approach [J].
Hobbs, BF ;
Metzler, CB ;
Pang, JS .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2000, 15 (02) :638-645
[8]  
Hogan W.W., 2002, Financial Transmission Right Formulations
[9]  
*ISO NEW ENGL, ISO NEW ENGL MAN FIN
[10]   Transmission rights and market power on electric power networks [J].
Joskow, PL ;
Tirole, J .
RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2000, 31 (03) :450-487