Determination of total sulfur in diesel fuel employing NIR spectroscopy and multivariate calibration

被引:108
作者
Breitkreitz, MC
Raimundo, IM
Rohwedder, JJR
Pasquini, C
Dantas, HA
José, GE
Araújo, MCU
机构
[1] Univ Estadual Campinas, Inst Chem, BR-13084971 Campinas, SP, Brazil
[2] IFPB, Dept Chem, Joao Pessoa, Paraiba, Brazil
关键词
D O I
10.1039/b305265f
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
A method for sulfur determination in diesel fuel employing near infrared spectroscopy, variable selection and multivariate calibration is described. The performances of principal component regression (PCR) and partial least square (PLS) chemometric methods were compared with those shown by multiple linear regression (MLR), performed after variable selection based on the genetic algorithm (GA) or the successive projection algorithm (SPA). Ninety seven diesel samples were divided into three sets (41 for calibration, 30 for internal validation and 26 for external validation), each of them covering the full range of sulfur concentrations (from 0.07 to 0.33% w/w). Transflectance measurements were performed from 850 to 1800 nm. Although principal component analysis identified the presence of three groups, PLS, PCR and MLR provided models whose predicting capabilities were independent of the diesel type. Calibration with PLS and PCR employing all the 454 wavelengths provided root mean square errors of prediction (RMSEP) of 0.036% and 0.043% for the validation set, respectively. The use of GA and SPA for variable selection provided calibration models based on 19 and 9 wavelengths, with a RMSEP of 0.031% (PLS-GA), 0.022% (MLR-SPA) and 0.034% (MLR-GA). As the ASTM 4294 method allows a reproducibility of 0.05%, it can be concluded that a method based on NIR spectroscopy and multivariate calibration can be employed for the determination of sulfur in diesel fuels. Furthermore, the selection of variables can provide more robust calibration models and SPA provided more parsimonious models than GA.
引用
收藏
页码:1204 / 1207
页数:4
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] ALBRO TG, 1993, HRC-J HIGH RES CHROM, V16, P13
  • [2] The successive projections algorithm for variable selection in spectroscopic multicomponent analysis
    Araújo, MCU
    Saldanha, TCB
    Galvao, RKH
    Yoneyama, T
    Chame, HC
    Visani, V
    [J]. CHEMOMETRICS AND INTELLIGENT LABORATORY SYSTEMS, 2001, 57 (02) : 65 - 73
  • [3] *ASTM, D126691 ASTM
  • [4] *ASTM, D429490 ASTM
  • [5] *ASTM, D312092 ASTM
  • [6] Prediction of gasoline properties with near infrared spectroscopy
    Bohács, G
    Ovádi, Z
    Salgó, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEAR INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY, VOL 6 1998, 1998, : 341 - 348
  • [7] BOKOBZA L, 1998, J NEAR INFRARED SPEC, V6, P1998
  • [8] DETERMINATION OF TOTAL SULFUR IN GASOLINE BY GAS-CHROMATOGRAPHY WITH A FLAME PHOTOMETRIC DETECTOR
    CLAY, DA
    ROGERS, CH
    JUNGERS, RH
    [J]. ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1977, 49 (01) : 126 - 128
  • [9] Comparison of near-IR, Raman, and mid-IR spectroscopies for the determination of BTEX in petroleum fuels
    Cooper, JB
    Wise, KL
    Welch, WT
    Sumner, MB
    Wilt, BK
    Bledsoe, RR
    [J]. APPLIED SPECTROSCOPY, 1997, 51 (11) : 1613 - 1620
  • [10] DISANZO FP, 1994, J HIGH RES CHROMATOG, V4, P225