Randomized, double-blind comparison of immediate-release omeprazole oral suspension versus intravenous cimetidine for the prevention of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in critically ill patients

被引:112
作者
Conrad, SA [1 ]
Gabrielli, A
Margolis, B
Quartin, A
Hata, JS
Frank, WO
Bagin, RG
Rock, JA
Hepburn, B
Laine, L
机构
[1] Louisiana State Univ Hlth Sci Ctr, Shreveport, LA 71105 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Dept Anesthesiol, Gainesville, FL USA
[3] W Suburban Hosp, Oak Pk, IL USA
[4] Univ Miami, Div Pulm & Crit Care Med, Miami, FL 33152 USA
[5] Univ Iowa, Dept Anesthesiol & Intens Care, Div Crit Care Med, Iowa City, IA USA
[6] Santarus, San Diego, CA USA
[7] Univ So Calif, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
omeprazole; cimetidine; gastrointestinal bleeding; nosocomial pneumonia; mechanical ventilation;
D O I
10.1097/01.CCM.0000157751.92249.32
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective. To demonstrate that a new immediate-release omeprazole oral suspension is effective in preventing upper gastrointestinal bleeding in critically ill patients. Design: A noninferiority analysis was used to compare rates of clinically significant upper gastrointestinal bleeding in a prospective, phase 3, double-blind trial with parallel omeprazole suspension and cimetidine treatment groups. Setting: A total of 47 intensive care units in the United States. Patients: A total of 359 critically ill patients who required mechanical ventilation for >= 48 hrs, had an Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation score of >= 11 at baseline, had an intact stomach with a nasogastric or orogastric tube in place, and had at least one additional risk factor for upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Interventions: Patients were randomized to treatment with omeprazole suspension (two 40-mg doses on day 1, via orogastric or nasogastric tube, and 40 mg each day thereafter) or intravenous cimetidine (300-mg bolus and 50 mg/hr thereafter) for up to 14 days. Gastric aspirates were sampled for bleeding and pH. Medication doses Were doubled for failure of pH control (two successive aspirates with pH <= 4). Measurements and Main Results., Clinically significant upper gastrointestinal bleeding (bright red blood not clearing after 5-10 mins of lavage or persistent Gastroccult-positive "coffee-grounds" material for 8 hrs on days 1-2 or for 2-4 hrs on days 3-14 and not clearing with 100 mL of lavage) was the primary end point of the trial. The rate of clinically significant bleeding in the per-protocol population was 4.5% with omeprazole suspension and 6.8% with cimetidine, meeting the criteria for the noninferiority of omeprazole suspension. Median gastric pH was :6 on all trial days with omeprazole suspension treatment and on 50% of days with cimetidine treatment (p < .001, all trial days). In the omeprazole suspension group, median gastric pH was > 4 on each trial day in 95% of patients. Conclusions: Immediate-release omeprazole suspension is effective in preventing upper gastrointestinal bleeding and more effective than intravenous cimetidine in maintaining gastric pH of > 4 in critically ill patients.
引用
收藏
页码:760 / 765
页数:6
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   A comparison of sucralfate and ranitidine for the prevention of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients requiring mechanical ventilation [J].
Cook, D ;
Guyatt, G ;
Marshall, J ;
Leasa, D ;
Fuller, H ;
Hall, R ;
Peters, S ;
Rutledge, F ;
Griffith, L ;
McLellan, A ;
Wood, G ;
Kirby, A .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1998, 338 (12) :791-797
[2]   RISK-FACTORS FOR GASTROINTESTINAL-BLEEDING IN CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS [J].
COOK, DJ ;
FULLER, HD ;
GUYATT, GH ;
MARSHALL, JC ;
LEASA, D ;
HALL, R ;
WINTON, TL ;
RUTLEDGE, F ;
TODD, TJR ;
ROY, P ;
LACROIX, J ;
GRIFFITH, L ;
WILLAN, A ;
NOSEWORTHY, T ;
POWLES, P ;
OPPENHEIMER, L ;
HEWSON, J ;
LANG, J ;
LEE, H ;
GUSLITS, B ;
HEULE, M .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1994, 330 (06) :377-381
[3]  
Cook DJ, 1996, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V275, P308, DOI 10.1001/jama.275.4.308
[4]  
CZAJA AJ, 1975, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V110, P600
[5]   NOSOCOMIAL PNEUMONIA IN INTUBATED PATIENTS GIVEN SUCRALFATE AS COMPARED WITH ANTACIDS OR HISTAMINE TYPE-2 BLOCKERS - THE ROLE OF GASTRIC COLONIZATION [J].
DRIKS, MR ;
CRAVEN, DE ;
CELLI, BR ;
MANNING, M ;
BURKE, RA ;
GARVIN, GM ;
KUNCHES, LM ;
FARBER, HW ;
WEDEL, SA ;
MCCABE, WR .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1987, 317 (22) :1376-1382
[6]   Pathophysiology of the upper gastrointestinal tract in the critically ill patient: Rationale for the therapeutic benefits of acid suppression [J].
Fennerty, MB .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2002, 30 (06) :S351-S355
[7]   Intravenous pantoprazole (IVP) and continuous infusion cimetidine (C) prevent upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) regardless of APSII score (APACHE II) in high risk intensive care unit (ICU) patients [J].
Fink, M ;
Karlstadt, RG ;
Maroko, RT ;
Field, B .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2003, 124 (04) :A625-A626
[8]   Problems related to acid rebound and tachyphylaxis [J].
Gillen, D ;
McColl, KEL .
BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2001, 15 (03) :487-495
[9]  
KAMADA T, 1982, GASTROENTEROLOGY, V83, P535
[10]   Comparison of omeprazole and ranitidine for stress ulcer prophylaxis [J].
Levy, MJ ;
Seelig, CB ;
Robinson, NJ ;
Ranney, JE .
DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 1997, 42 (06) :1255-1259