Clinical significance of an early protocol biopsy in living-donor renal transplantation: Ten-year experience at a single center

被引:114
作者
Choi, BS [1 ]
Shin, MJ
Shin, SJ
Kim, YS
Choi, YJ
Kim, YS
Moon, IS
Kim, SY
Koh, YB
Bang, BK
Yang, CW
机构
[1] Catholic Univ, Coll Med, Dept Internal Med, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Catholic Univ, Coll Med, Dept Clin Pathol, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Catholic Univ, Coll Med, Dept Surg, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
kidney transplantation; living-related donors; protocol biopsy;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.00830.x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
We report here our 10-year experience of a biopsy performed at day 14 after transplantation in 304 patients with stable graft function. The factors that may have influenced subclinical rejection were analyzed according to histology. The incidence of subclinical rejection was 13.2%. Addition of mycophenolate mofetile (MMF) as a primary immunosuppressant significantly decreased the incidence of subclinical rejection compared with patients without such treatment (odds ratio, 0.23; p < 0.05). On the other hand, HLA-DR antigen mismatch (odds ratio, 2.39) and unrelated donor (odds ratio, 2.10) were also significantly associated with decreased subclinical rejection (p < 0.05). The incidence of acute rejection in patients with normal findings was lower than in those with borderline changes or subclinical rejection (0.23 +/- 0.05 vs. 0.48 +/- 0.07 and 0.60 +/- 0.11, respectively; p < 0.05). The graft survival rates in patients with subclinical rejection were lower than in patients with normal or borderline changes at 1 (88.4% vs. 97.9% and 99.1%; p < 0.05), 5 (77.8% vs. 96.2% and 95.9%; p < 0.05) and 10 (62.3% vs. 96.2% and 93.7%; p < 0.05) years. Thus, a protocol biopsy performed on day 14 after transplantation is useful for predicting graft survival. Triple therapy including MMF, related donor and HLA-DR antigen match are important factors for reducing subclinical rejection in living-donor renal transplantation.
引用
收藏
页码:1354 / 1360
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   CHARACTERISTICS OF EARLY ROUTINE RENAL-ALLOGRAFT BIOPSIES [J].
BURDICK, JF ;
BESCHORNER, WE ;
SMITH, WJ ;
MCGRAW, D ;
BENDER, WL ;
WILLIAMS, GM ;
SOLEZ, K .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1984, 38 (06) :679-684
[2]   CYCLOSPORINE AND RENAL GRAFT HISTOLOGY [J].
DARDENNE, AJ ;
DUNNILL, MS ;
THOMPSON, JF ;
MCWHINNIE, D ;
WOOD, RFM ;
MORRIS, PJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 1986, 39 (02) :145-151
[3]   A blinded retrospective analysis of renal allograft pathology using the banff schema - Implications for clinical management [J].
Dean, DE ;
Kamath, S ;
Peddi, VR ;
Schroeder, TJ ;
First, MR ;
Cavallo, T .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1999, 68 (05) :642-645
[4]   Increased rejection in living unrelated versus living related kidney transplants does not affect short-term function and survival [J].
Fuller, TF ;
Feng, S ;
Brennan, TV ;
Tomlanovich, S ;
Bostrom, A ;
Freise, CE .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 78 (07) :1030-1035
[5]   Protocol biopsy of the stable renal transplant:: A multicenter study of methods and complication rates [J].
Furness, PN ;
Philpott, CM ;
Chorbadjian, MT ;
Nicholson, ML ;
Bosmans, JL ;
Corthouts, BL ;
Bogers, JJPM ;
Schwarz, A ;
Gwinner, W ;
Haller, H ;
Mengel, M ;
Seron, D ;
Moreso, F ;
Cañas, C .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 76 (06) :969-973
[6]  
GRINYO J, 1995, LANCET, V345, P1321
[7]   SAFETY ASPECTS AND DIAGNOSTIC-FINDINGS OF SERIAL RENAL-ALLOGRAFT BIOPSIES, OBTAINED BY AN AUTOMATIC TECHNIQUE WITH A MIDSIZE NEEDLE [J].
HANAS, E ;
LARSSON, E ;
FELLSTROM, B ;
LINDGREN, PG ;
ANDERSSON, T ;
BUSCH, C ;
FRODIN, L ;
WAHLBERG, J ;
TUFVESON, G .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 1992, 26 (04) :413-420
[8]  
HEEMANN UW, 1994, TRANSPLANTATION, V58, P1317
[9]  
Keown P, 1996, TRANSPLANTATION, V61, P1029
[10]   Histologic features of chronic allograft nephropathy revealed by protocol biopsies in kidney transplant recipients [J].
Legendre, C ;
Thervet, E ;
Skhiri, H ;
Mamzer-Bruneel, MF ;
Cantarovich, F ;
Noel, LH ;
Kreis, H .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1998, 65 (11) :1506-1509