Community-acquired pneumonia recovery in the elderly (CAPRIE): Efficacy and safety of moxifloxacin therapy versus that of levofloxacin therapy

被引:69
作者
Anzueto, A
Niederman, MS
Pearle, J
Restrepo, MI
Heyder, A
Choudhri, SH
机构
[1] Univ Texas, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Med, San Antonio, TX 78284 USA
[2] S Texas Vet Healthcare Syst, Dept Med, Vet Evidence Based Res Disseminat & Implementat C, San Antonio, TX USA
[3] Winthrop Univ Hosp, Dept Med, Mineola, NY 11501 USA
[4] Calif Res Med Grp, Fullerton, CA USA
[5] Carolina Res Specialists, Elizabeth City, NC USA
[6] Bayer Pharmaceut, West Haven, CT USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
D O I
10.1086/498520
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. Limited prospective data are available for elderly patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). This study aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of moxifloxacin versus that of levofloxacin for the treatment of CAP in hospitalized elderly patients (age, >= 65 years). Methods. We conducted a prospective, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Eligible patients were stratified by CAP severity before randomization to receive treatment with either intravenous/oral moxifloxacin (400 mg daily) or intravenous/oral levofloxacin (500 mg daily) for 7-14 days. Clinical response at test-of-cure (the primary efficacy end point was between days 5 and 21 after completion of therapy), and clinical response during therapy (between days 3 and 5 after the start of therapy) and bacteriologic response were secondary end points. Results. The safety population included 394 patients ( 195 in the moxifloxacin group and 199 in the levofloxacin group). The population eligible for clinical efficacy analysis (i.e., the clinically valid population) included 281 patients (141 in the moxifloxacin group and 140 in the levofloxacin group); 51.3% were male, and the mean age (+/- SD) was years. Cure rates at test-of-cure for the clinically valid population were 92.9% in the 77.4 +/- 7.7 moxifloxacin arm and 87.9% in the levofloxacin arm (95% confidence interval [CI], -1.9 to 11.9; P=.2). Clinical recovery by days 3-5 after the start of treatment was 97.9% in the moxifloxacin arm vs. 90.0% in the levofloxacin arm (95% CI, 1.7-14.1; P=.01). In the moxifloxacin group, cure rates were 92.6% for patients with mild or moderate CAP and 94.7% for patients with severe CAP, compared with cure rates of 88.6% and 84.6%, respectively, in the levofloxacin group (significant). Cure rates in the moxifloxacin arm were 90.0% for patients aged 65-74 years and 94.5% for patients aged >= 75 years, compared with 85.0% and 90.0%, respectively, in the levofloxacin arm (significant). There were no statistically significant differences between the treatment groups Ppnot with regard to drug-related adverse events. Conclusions. Intravenous/ oral moxifloxacin therapy was efficacious and safe for hospitalized elderly patients with CAP, achieving > 90% cure in all severity and age subgroups, and was associated with faster clinical recovery than intravenous/oral levofloxacin therapy, with a comparable safety profile.
引用
收藏
页码:73 / 81
页数:9
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Antecedent use of fluoroquinolones is associated with resistance to moxifloxacin in Clostridium difficile [J].
Ackermann, G ;
Tang-Feldman, YJ ;
Schaumann, R ;
Henderson, JP ;
Rodloff, AC ;
Silva, J ;
Cohen, SH .
CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2003, 9 (06) :526-530
[2]  
CHOUDHRI SH, 2002, 40 ANN M INF DIS SOC, P75
[3]   High-dose, short-course Levofloxacin for community-acquired pneumonia: A new treatment paradigm [J].
Dunbar, LM ;
Wunderink, RG ;
Habib, MP ;
Smith, LG ;
Tennenberg, AM ;
Khashab, MM ;
Wiesinger, BA ;
Xiang, JX ;
Zadeikis, N ;
Kahn, JB .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2003, 37 (06) :752-760
[4]   Indicators of recurrent hospitalization for pneumonia in the elderly [J].
El Solh, AA ;
Brewer, T ;
Okada, M ;
Bashir, O ;
Gough, M .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2004, 52 (12) :2010-2015
[5]  
File TM, 2001, TODAYS THER TRENDS, V19, P251
[6]   Randomized controlled trial of sequential intravenous (i.v.) and oral moxifloxacin compared with sequential i.v. and oral co-amoxiclav with or without clarithromycin in patients with community-acquired pneumonia requiring initial parenteral treatment [J].
Finch, R ;
Schürmann, D ;
Collins, O ;
Kubin, R ;
McGivern, J ;
Bobbaers, H ;
Izquierdo, JL ;
Nikolaides, P ;
Ogundare, F ;
Raz, R ;
Zuck, P ;
Hoeffken, G .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2002, 46 (06) :1746-1754
[7]   Prognosis and outcomes of patients with community-acquired pneumonia - A meta-analysis [J].
Fine, MJ ;
Smith, MA ;
Carson, CA ;
Mutha, SS ;
Sankey, SS ;
Weissfeld, LA ;
Kapoor, WN .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 275 (02) :134-141
[8]   A prediction rule to identify low-risk patients with community-acquired pneumonia [J].
Fine, MJ ;
Auble, TE ;
Yealy, DM ;
Hanusa, BH ;
Weissfeld, LA ;
Singer, DE ;
Coley, CM ;
Marrie, TJ ;
Kapoor, WN .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1997, 336 (04) :243-250
[9]  
Fogarty C, 1999, INFECT MED, V16, P748
[10]   Outbreak of Clostridium difficile infection in a long-term care facility:: Association with gatifloxacin use [J].
Gaynes, R ;
Rimland, D ;
Killum, E ;
Lowery, HK ;
Johnson, TM ;
Killgore, G ;
Tenover, FC .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2004, 38 (05) :640-645