Masking author identity in peer review - What factors influence masking success?

被引:69
作者
Cho, MK
Justice, AC
Winker, MA
Berlin, JA
Waeckerle, JF
Callaham, ML
Rennie, D
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Ctr Bioeth, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Dept Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Div Gen Internal Med, Cleveland, OH USA
[3] Dept Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Program Hlth Care Res, Cleveland, OH USA
[4] Case Western Reserve Univ, Univ Hosp Cleveland, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[5] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Dept Biostat & Epidemiol, Div Biostat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[6] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Ctr Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[7] Univ Missouri, Sch Med, Dept Emergency Med, Kansas City, MO 64108 USA
[8] Univ Calif San Francisco, Sch Med, Div Emergency Med, San Francisco, CA USA
[9] Univ Calif San Francisco, Inst Hlth Policy Studies, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
来源
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 1998年 / 280卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jama.280.3.243
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context.-In a previous study, we found that masking success was higher at a journal that masked reviewers to author identity. We hypothesized that masking policy or other factors could be associated with masking success. Objectives.-To evaluate differences in success of masking reviewers to author identity at 7 biomedical journals and to identify factors associated with these differences. Design.-Written questionnaire. Participants.-Reviewers at 3 journals with a long-standing policy of masking author identity (Annals of Emergency Medicine, Epidemiology, and Journal of the American Geriatrics Society) and 4 journals without a policy of masking author identity (Annals of Infernal Medicine, JAMA, Obstetrics & Gynecology, and Ophthalmology). Main Outcome Measures.-Masking success (percentage of reviewers successfully masked) and reviewer characteristics associated with masking. Results.-There was no significant difference in masking success between journals with a policy of masking (60%) and those without (58%) (P=.92). We found no association between masking success and a policy of masking when adjusted for the reviewer characteristics of age, sex, years of reviewing experience, number of articles published, number of articles reviewed, percentage of time spent in research, editorial experience, or academic rank (odds ratio [OR], 1.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64-2.8; P=.43). In multivariable analysis of reviewer characteristics, reviewers spending a greater percentage of time in research, the only significant predictor of masking success, were less likely to be successfully masked (OR, 1.01;95% CI, 1.00-1.02) (P=.04). Conclusions.-Masking success appears unrelated to a journal policy of masking, but is associated with reviewers' research experience and could be affected by other characteristics. Using reviewers with less research and reviewing experience might increase masking success, but the effect on review quality is unknown.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 245
页数:3
相关论文
共 5 条
[1]   THE EFFECTS OF BLINDING ON ACCEPTANCE OF RESEARCH PAPERS BY PEER-REVIEW [J].
FISHER, M ;
FRIEDMAN, SB ;
STRAUSS, B .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1994, 272 (02) :143-146
[2]   Does masking author identity improve peer review quality? - A randomized controlled trial [J].
Justice, AC ;
Cho, MK ;
Winker, MA ;
Berlin, JA ;
Rennie, D .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (03) :240-242
[3]   THE EFFECTS OF BLINDING ON THE QUALITY OF PEER-REVIEW - A RANDOMIZED TRIAL [J].
MCNUTT, RA ;
EVANS, AT ;
FLETCHER, RH ;
FLETCHER, SW .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1990, 263 (10) :1371-1376
[4]   ANONYMOUS AUTHORS, ANONYMOUS REFEREES - AN EDITORIAL EXPLORATION [J].
MOOSSY, J ;
MOOSSY, YR .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPATHOLOGY AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROLOGY, 1985, 44 (03) :225-228
[5]   HOW BLIND IS BLIND REVIEW [J].
YANKAUER, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1991, 81 (07) :843-845