Hysterectomy rates in the United States, 2003

被引:475
作者
Wu, Jennifer M.
Wechter, Mary Ellen
Geller, Elizabeth J.
Nguyen, Thao V.
Visco, Anthony G.
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Chapel Hill, NC 27514 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.AOG.0000285997.38553.4b
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To estimate hysterectomy rates by type of hysterectomy and to compare age, length of stay, and regional variation in type of hysterectomy performed for benign indications. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of national discharge data using the 2003 Nationwide Inpatient Sample. These data represent a 20% stratified sample of U.S. hospitals. Women aged 16 years or older who underwent a hysterectomy were identified by International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification procedure codes. We extracted data regarding age, race, diagnoses codes, length of stay, and hospital characteristics. Using 2000 National Census data and weighted data analysis for cluster sampling, we calculated hysterectomy rates. Results: In 2003, 602,457 hysterectomies were performed, for a rate of 5.38 per 1,000 women-years. Of the 538,722 hysterectomies for benign disease (rate 4.81 per 1,000 women-years), the abdominal route was the most common (66.1%), followed by vaginal (21.8%) and laparoscopic (11.8%) routes. Mean ages (+/- standard deviation) differed among hysterectomy types (abdominal 44.5 +/- 0.1 years, vaginal 48.2 +/- 0.2 years, and laparoscopic 43.6 +/- 0.3 years, P<.001). Mean lengths of stay (+/- standard deviation) were also different (3.0 +/- 0.03 days, 2.0 +/- 0.03 days, 1.7 +/- 0.03 days, respectively, P<.001). The hysterectomy rate was highest in the South (5.92 per 1,000 women-years) and lowest in the Northeast (3.33 per 1,000 women-years). Conclusion: Despite a shorter length of stay, vaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomies remain far less common than abdominal hysterectomy for benign disease.
引用
收藏
页码:1091 / 1095
页数:5
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
*AG HEALTH RES QUA, CLIN CLASS SOFTW CCS
[2]  
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2005, Obstet Gynecol, V105, P929
[3]  
[Anonymous], US CENS 2000
[4]   Costs and charges associated with three alternative techniques of hysterectomy [J].
Dorsey, JH ;
Holtz, PM ;
Griffiths, RI ;
McGrath, MM ;
Steinberg, EP .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 335 (07) :476-482
[5]   Perceived proficiency in endoscopic techniques among senior obstetrics and gynecology residents [J].
Einarsson, JI ;
Young, A ;
Tsien, L ;
Sangi-Haghpeykar, H .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF GYNECOLOGIC LAPAROSCOPISTS, 2002, 9 (02) :158-164
[6]   Prospective randomized clinical trial of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy [J].
Falcone, T ;
Paraiso, MFR ;
Mascha, E .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 180 (04) :955-962
[7]   Hysterectomy rates in the United States 1990-1997 [J].
Farquhar, CM ;
Steiner, CA .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 99 (02) :229-234
[8]  
Garry R, 2004, HEALTH TECHNOL ASSES, V8, P1
[9]   Laparoscopic hysterectomy: The kaiser permanente San Diego experience [J].
Hoffman, CP ;
Kennedy, J ;
Borschel, L ;
Burchette, R ;
Kidd, A .
JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 12 (01) :16-24
[10]   Hysterectomy rates for benign indications [J].
Jacobson, Gavin F. ;
Shaber, Ruth E. ;
Armstrong, Mary Anne ;
Hung, Yun-Yi .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 107 (06) :1278-1283