Postoperative pain management in the neurosurgical patient

被引:13
作者
Cousins, MJ [1 ]
Umedaly, HS [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV SYDNEY, SYDNEY, NSW 2006, AUSTRALIA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00004311-199603440-00013
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
We hope to have inspired an interest in approaching the pain management issues in this challenging group of patients. Despite significant progress in understanding the pathophysiology of pain, the development of therapeutic options, and the publication and dissemination of guidelines, this progress does not seem to have been adopted into clinical practice. Bonica has stated 'for many years I have studied the reasons for inadequate management of postoperative pain, and they remain the same. . . . Inadequate or improper application of available information and therapies is certainly the most important reason' [71]. Let us accept the challenge to re-evaluate pain management in the postoperative neurosurgical patient. Future development may provide enhanced multimodal analgesia with the development of enantioselective NSAIDs and peripherally acting opioids that do not cross the blood-brain barrier. Targeted inhibition of the central neuroplasticity that underlies sensitization, rather than attempts to use pre-emptive analgesics, may be more fruitful. Inhibition of excitatory amino acids may prove beneficial for perioperative neuroprotection and pain management. In addition, longer-acting local anesthetics show significant promise. The importance of understanding the specific benefits available and matching these characteristics to the particular patient is emphasized. Evaluation of outcomes, including morbidity and patient satisfaction, will determine if effective and rational provision of analgesia may indeed be safer than withholding analgesia. However, it is clear that re-evaluation and refinement of conventional therapy is necessary.
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 193
页数:15
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]   SUFENTANIL INCREASES INTRACRANIAL-PRESSURE IN PATIENTS WITH HEAD TRAUMA [J].
ALBANESE, J ;
DURBEC, O ;
VIVIAND, X ;
POTIE, F ;
ALLIEZ, B ;
MARTIN, C .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1993, 79 (03) :493-497
[2]   SAFETY, TOLERABILITY, AND PHARMACOKINETICS OF THE N-METHYL-D-ASPARTATE ANTAGONIST DEXTRORPHAN IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE STROKE [J].
ALBERS, GW ;
ATKINSON, RP ;
KELLEY, RE ;
ROSENBAUM, DM .
STROKE, 1995, 26 (02) :254-258
[3]   PUPIL RESPONSE TO ALFENTANIL AND FENTANYL - A STUDY IN PATIENTS ANESTHETIZED WITH HALOTHANE [J].
ASBURY, AJ .
ANAESTHESIA, 1986, 41 (07) :717-720
[4]   RESPIRATORY-RELATED CRITICAL EVENTS WITH INTRAVENOUS PATIENT-CONTROLLED ANALGESIA [J].
ASHBURN, MA ;
LOVE, G ;
PACE, NL .
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 1994, 10 (01) :52-56
[5]  
ASHBURN MA, 1994, ANESTH ANALG, V78, pU19
[6]   MULTIPLE INTRAMUSCULAR INJECTIONS - MAJOR SOURCE OF VARIABILITY IN ANALGESIC RESPONSE TO MEPERIDINE [J].
AUSTIN, KL ;
STAPLETON, JV ;
MATHER, LE .
PAIN, 1980, 8 (01) :47-62
[7]   OPTIMAL PAIN CONTROL IN THE INTENSIVE-CARE UNIT [J].
BERNAUER, EA ;
YEAGER, MP .
INTERNATIONAL ANESTHESIOLOGY CLINICS, 1993, 31 (02) :201-221
[8]   ACETAMINOPHEN BLOCKS SPINAL HYPERALGESIA INDUCED BY NMDA AND SUBSTANCE-P [J].
BJORKMAN, R ;
HALLMAN, KM ;
HEDNER, J ;
HEDNER, T ;
HENNING, M .
PAIN, 1994, 57 (03) :259-264
[9]  
Bonica J., 1990, Management of Pain, V2nd
[10]  
BONICA JJ, 1988, NEURAL BLOCKADE CLIN, P1119