Optimal Presentation Modes for Detecting Brain Tumor Progression

被引:8
作者
Erickson, B. J. [1 ]
Wood, C. P. [1 ]
Kaufmann, T. J. [1 ]
Patriarche, J. W. [3 ]
Mandrekar, J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Radiol, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Dept Biostat, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[3] Univ Hawaii, Dept Informat & Comp Sci, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA
关键词
AUTOMATED CHANGE DETECTION; SERIAL MR; CT SCANS; IMAGE REGISTRATION; SUBTRACTION; PACS; FILM;
D O I
10.3174/ajnr.A2596
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: A common task in radiology interpretation is visual comparison of images. The purpose of this study was to compare traditional side-by-side and in-place (flicker) image presentation modes with advanced methods for detecting primary brain tumors on MR imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified 66 patients with gliomas and 3 consecutive brain MR imaging examinations (a "triplet"). A display application that presented images in side-by-side mode with or without flicker display as well as display of image subtraction or automated change detection information (also with and without flicker display) was used by 3 board-certified neuroradiologists. They identified regions of brain tumor progression by using this display application. Each case was reviewed using all modes (side-by-side presentation with and without flicker, subtraction with and without flicker, and change detection with and without flicker), with results compared via a panel rating. RESULTS: Automated change detection with or without flicker (P < .0027) as well as subtraction with or without flicker (P < .0027) were more sensitive to tumor progression than side-by-side presentation in cases where all 3 raters agreed. Change detection afforded the highest interrater agreement, followed by subtraction. Clinically determined time to progression was longer for cases rated as nonprogressing by using subtraction images and change-detection images both with and without flicker display mode compared with side-by-side presentation. CONCLUSIONS: Automated change detection and image subtraction, with and without flicker display mode, are superior to side-by-side image comparison.
引用
收藏
页码:1652 / 1657
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   Performance evaluation of an automated system for registration and postprocessing of CT scans [J].
Alpert, NM ;
Berdichevsky, D ;
Levin, Z ;
Thangaraj, V ;
Gonzalez, G ;
Lev, MH .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2001, 25 (05) :747-752
[2]  
Chan Lawrence, 2002, J Digit Imaging, V15 Suppl 1, P131, DOI 10.1007/s10278-002-5019-8
[4]  
Erickson BJ, 2007, CANCER INFORM, V4, P19
[5]   Effect of automated image registration on radiologist interpretation [J].
Erickson, Bradley J. ;
Mandrekar, Jayawant ;
Wang, Liqin ;
Patriarche, Julia W. ;
Bartholmai, Brian J. ;
Wood, Christropher P. ;
Lindell, E. Paul ;
Sykes, Anne-Marie ;
Harms, Gordon F. ;
Lindell, Rebecca M. ;
Andirole, Katherine .
JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 2007, 20 (02) :105-113
[6]   Radiologists' reading times using PACS and using films: One practice's experience [J].
Fleishon, HB ;
Bhargavan, M ;
Meghea, C .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2006, 13 (04) :453-460
[7]   DETECTION OF SUBTLE BRAIN CHANGES USING SUBVOXEL REGISTRATION AND SUBTRACTION OF SERIAL MR-IMAGES [J].
HAJNAL, JV ;
SAEED, N ;
OATRIDGE, A ;
WILLIAMS, EJ ;
YOUNG, IR ;
BYDDER, GM .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1995, 19 (05) :677-691
[8]   Timed Efficiency of Interpretation of Digital and Film-Screen Screening Mammograms [J].
Haygood, Tamara Miner ;
Wang, Jihong ;
Atkinson, E. Neely ;
Lane, Deanna ;
Stephens, Tanya W. ;
Patel, Parul ;
Whitman, Gary J. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2009, 192 (01) :216-220
[9]   Interpretation of CT scans with PACS image display in stack mode [J].
Mathie, AG ;
Strickland, NH .
RADIOLOGY, 1997, 203 (01) :207-209
[10]  
MATSUO Y, 2007, SYST COMPUT JPN, V36, P30