What happens to the abstracts presented at the Societe Internationale d'Urologie meeting?

被引:25
作者
Autorino, Riccardo
Quarto, Giuseppe
Di Lorenzo, Giuseppe
Giugliano, Francesco
Quattrone, Carmelo
Neri, Fabio
De Domenico, Renato
Sorrentino, Domenico
Mordente, Salvatore
Damiano, Rocco
De Sio, Marco
机构
[1] Seconda Univ, Urol Clin, Naples, Italy
[2] Magna Graecia Univ Catanzaro, Cattedra Urol, Catanzaro, Italy
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2007.11.028
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES To estimate the acceptance rate on peer-reviewed journals, describe the time-course of subsequent full publication, and identify those with characteristics associated with publication from the abstracts presented at the Societe Internationale d'Urologie (SIU) meeting. METHODS All abstracts accepted for presentation at the annual 2002 and 2004 SIU meetings were identified from the published supplements in the BJU International. The subsequent publication rate for the corresponding studies by scanning Medline was evaluated. RESULTS Overall, 1877 abstracts were presented, 415 of which (22.1%) were followed by publication in peer-reviewed journals. The mean time to publication was 13 months (range, I to 45 months). A total of 60.6% of the published articles were in print within I year of presentation "In most of the cases the reports were published in The Journal of Urology (76 reports) and in Urology (49 reports). Abstracts on kidney cancer, urinary diversion, incontinence, and urolithiasis had the highest publication rates (43.4%, 36.6%, 33.3%, and 29.2%, respectively). Studies from North America and from Oceania had the highest publication rate (26.8% and 26.6%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS One fifth of the abstracts presented at the SIU meetings are ultimately published in indexed journals. Delegates attending these meetings should be aware of this issue when taking into account findings from meeting reports for their clinical practice. Factors influencing their publication are the abstract geographical area of origin, the study subject, and the research type. The Journal of Urology and Urology represented target journals for the publication more than other ones.
引用
收藏
页码:367 / 371
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1997, JAMA, V277, P927
[2]   Subsequent publication of orally presented original studies within 5 years after 1995 RSNA Scientific Assembly [J].
Arrivé, L ;
Boelle, PY ;
Dono, P ;
Lewin, M ;
Monnier-Cholley, L ;
Tubiana, JM .
RADIOLOGY, 2004, 232 (01) :101-106
[3]   Are abstracts presented at the EAU meeting followed by publication in peer-reviewed journals? A critical analysis [J].
Autorino, Riccardo ;
Quarto, Giuseppe ;
Di Lorenzo, Giuseppe ;
De Sio, Marco ;
Damiano, Rocco .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2007, 51 (03) :833-840
[4]   Fate of abstracts presented at the World Congress of Endourology: Are they followed by publication in peer-reviewed journals? [J].
Autorino, Riccardo ;
Quarto, Giuseppe ;
De Sio, Marco ;
Lima, Estevao ;
Quarto, Ernesto ;
Damiano, Rocco ;
Oliviero, Rosario ;
Osorio, Luis ;
Marcelo, Filinto ;
D'Armiento, Massimo .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2006, 20 (12) :996-1001
[5]   Identifying studies for systematic reviews - An example from medical imaging [J].
Berry, E ;
Kelly, S ;
Hutton, J ;
Harris, KM ;
Smith, MA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2000, 16 (02) :668-672
[6]   Positive-outcome bias and other limitations in the outcome of research abstracts submitted to a scientific meeting [J].
Callaham, ML ;
Wears, RL ;
Weber, EJ ;
Barton, C ;
Young, G .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (03) :254-257
[7]   Publish or be damned? The fate of abstracts presented at the International Continence Society Meeting 2003 [J].
Cartwright, Rufus ;
Khoo, Abigail Kate ;
Cardozo, Linda .
NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2007, 26 (02) :154-157
[8]   FACTORS INFLUENCING PUBLICATION OF RESEARCH RESULTS - FOLLOW-UP OF APPLICATIONS SUBMITTED TO 2 INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARDS [J].
DICKERSIN, K ;
MIN, YI ;
MEINERT, CL .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1992, 267 (03) :374-378
[9]   Factors associated with acceptance and full publication of GI endoscopic research originally published in abstract form [J].
Eloubeidi, MA ;
Wade, SB ;
Provenzale, D .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2001, 53 (03) :275-282
[10]   Interpreting statistics in medical literature:: A vade mecum for surgeons [J].
Guller, U ;
DeLong, ER .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2004, 198 (03) :441-458