Comment on Bruce J. Katz and Margery Austin Turner's "Who should run the housing voucher program? A reform proposal": Why public housing authorities remain the best solution for running the housing voucher program

被引:7
作者
Basgal, OB [1 ]
Villarreal, J
机构
[1] Housing Author, Alameda, CA USA
[2] Housing Author, Oakland, CA USA
关键词
low-income housing; mobility; neighborhood;
D O I
10.1080/10511482.2001.9521404
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Katz and Turner propose that the Section 8 program be administered regionally at the metropolitan level by a single organization awarded the contract through a competitive bidding process. We disagree. Local public housing authorities have been successful in providing family housing choice and moving families from the worst neighborhoods through the Section 8 program. The factors that inhibit mixed-income communities and family mobility, resulting in concentration of poverty, are beyond the control of these authorities and will be affected little by a change in administration. Moreover, the additional cost of these changes would decrease the number of families served and at the same time increase bureaucracy. We welcome the discussion the proposal has caused. Misperceptions exist about the program, even among those close to it. True, effective program reform can be engendered only by an honest dialogue among housing advocates, administrators, and consumers, both tenants and owners.
引用
收藏
页码:263 / 281
页数:19
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1998, IMPACT LOS ANGELES M
[2]  
[Anonymous], WHO SHOULD RUN HOUSI
[3]  
BREMMAN B, 2000, MOVING OPPORTUNITY R
[4]  
*COUNC LARG PUBL H, 2001, FACTS SECT 8 HOUS MO
[5]  
DARCY J, 2000, HARTFORD COURAN 1128
[6]  
DELCONTE A, 2001, POVERTY RES NEWS JAN, P3
[7]  
Duncan G., 2000, CAN HOUSING VOUCHERS
[8]  
GOERING J, 1995, REPORT C PROMOTING H
[9]  
Goering J., 1999, Moving to Opportunity for Fair Housing demonstration program
[10]  
GOLDSTEIN A, 2000, WASHINGTON POST 0510