Two-stage logarithmic goal programming method for generating weights from interval comparison matrices

被引:272
作者
Wang, YM
Yang, JB
Xu, DL
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Manchester Business Sch, Manchester M60 1QD, Lancs, England
[2] Fuzhou Univ, Sch Publ Adm, Fujian 350002, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
analytic hierarchy process (AHP); interval comparison matrix; fuzzy comparison matrix; goal programming; preference ranking; the extension principle; group decision making;
D O I
10.1016/j.fss.2004.10.020
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
A two-stage logarithmic goal programming (TLGP) method is proposed to generate weights from interval comparison matrices, which can be either consistent or inconsistent. The first stage is devised to minimize the inconsistency of interval comparison matrices and the second stage is developed to generate priorities under the condition of minimal inconsistency. The weights are assumed to be multiplicative rather than additive. In the case of hierarchical structures, a nonlinear programming method is used to aggregate local interval weights into global interval weights. A simple yet practical preference ranking method is investigated to compare the interval weights of criteria or rank alternatives in a multiplicative aggregation process. The proposed TLGP is also applicable to fuzzy comparison matrices when they are transformed into interval comparison matrices using a-level sets and the extension principle. Six numerical examples including a group decision analysis problem with a group of comparison matrices, a hierarchical decision problem and a fuzzy decision problem using fuzzy comparison matrix are examined to show the applications of the proposed methods. Comparisons with other existing procedures are made whenever possible. (c) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:475 / 498
页数:24
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1991, FUZZY SET THEORY ITS
[2]   APPROXIMATE ARTICULATION OF PREFERENCE AND PRIORITY DERIVATION [J].
ARBEL, A .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1989, 43 (03) :317-326
[3]   PREFERENCE SIMULATION AND PREFERENCE PROGRAMMING - ROBUSTNESS ISSUES IN PRIORITY DERIVATION [J].
ARBEL, A ;
VARGAS, LG .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1993, 69 (02) :200-209
[4]  
ARBEL A, 1991, LECT NOTES ECON MATH, V356, P79
[5]  
ARBEL A, 1992, MULTIPLE CRITERIA DE, P61
[6]   Deriving weights from pairwise comparison matrices [J].
Barzilai, J .
JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 1997, 48 (12) :1226-1232
[7]  
BONDER CGE, 1989, FUZZY SETS SYSTEMS, V29, P133
[8]   A REVIEW OF SOME METHODS FOR RANKING FUZZY SUBSETS [J].
BORTOLAN, G ;
DEGANI, R .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1985, 15 (01) :1-19
[9]   A GOAL PROGRAMMING METHOD FOR GENERATING PRIORITY VECTORS [J].
BRYSON, N .
JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 1995, 46 (05) :641-648
[10]  
Bryson N., 1996, EUR J OPER RES, V96, P379