A Protocol for eliciting nonmaterial values through a cultural ecosystem services frame

被引:156
作者
Gould, Rachelle K. [1 ,2 ]
Klain, Sarah C. [3 ]
Ardoin, Nicole M. [4 ,5 ]
Satterfield, Terre [3 ]
Woodside, Ulalia [6 ]
Hannahs, Neil [6 ]
Daily, Gretchen C. [5 ,7 ]
Chan, Kai M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Emmett Interdisciplinary Program Environm & Resou, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Resources & Ctr Conservat Biol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Univ British Columbia, Inst Resources Environm & Sustainabil, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
[4] Stanford Univ, Grad Sch Educ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[5] Stanford Univ, Woods Inst Environm, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[6] Kamehameha Sch Land Assets Div, Honolulu, HI 96813 USA
[7] Stanford Univ, Ctr Conservat Biol, Dept Biol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
British Columbia; deliberative decision making; environmental management; environmental values; Hawaii; social-ecological systems; social science; COASTAL; MATTERS;
D O I
10.1111/cobi.12407
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Stakeholders' nonmaterial desires, needs, and values often critically influence the success of conservation projects. These considerations are challenging to articulate and characterize, resulting in their limited uptake in management and policy. We devised an interview protocol designed to enhance understanding of cultural ecosystem services (CES). The protocol begins with discussion of ecosystem-related activities (e.g., recreation, hunting) and management and then addresses CES, prompting for values encompassing concepts identified in the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) and explored in other CES research. We piloted the protocol in Hawaii and British Columbia. In each location, we interviewed 30 individuals from diverse backgrounds. We analyzed results from the 2 locations to determine the effectiveness of the interview protocol in elucidating nonmaterial values. The qualitative and spatial components of the protocol helped characterize cultural, social, and ethical values associated with ecosystems in multiple ways. Maps and situational, or vignette-like, questions helped respondents articulate difficult-to-discuss values. Open-ended prompts allowed respondents to express a diversity of ecosystem-related values and proved sufficiently flexible for interviewees to communicate values for which the protocol did not explicitly probe. Finally, the results suggest that certain values, those mentioned frequently throughout the interview, are particularly salient for particular populations. The protocol can provide efficient, contextual, and place-based data on the importance of particular ecosystem attributes for human well-being. Qualitative data are complementary to quantitative and spatial assessments in the comprehensive representation of people's values pertaining to ecosystems, and this protocol may assist in incorporating values frequently overlooked in decision making processes.
引用
收藏
页码:575 / 586
页数:12
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
Alvesson MatsKaj Skoldberg., 2009, REFLEXIVE METHODOLOG, V2nd
[2]  
[Anonymous], VAL PROT EC SYST SER
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2009, VALUE FOCUSED THINKI
[4]  
[Anonymous], ECOLOGICAL INDICATOR
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1992, EMERGENCE VS FORCING
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2009, EXP LANDSC CAPT CULT
[7]  
[Anonymous], IEA TRAINING MANUAL
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2005, EC HUM WELL BEING
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Comparative European Politics, DOI [DOI 10.1057/PALGRAVE.CEP.6110002, 10.1057/palgrave.cep.6110002]