Can meaningful effective connectivities be obtained between auditory cortical regions?

被引:50
作者
Gonçalves, MS
Hall, DA
Johnsrude, IS
Haggard, MP
机构
[1] MRC, Inst Hearing Res, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
[2] MRC, Cognit & Brain Sci Unit, Cambridge CB2 2EF, England
[3] Wellcome Dept Cognit Neurol, Funct Imaging Lab, London WC1N 3BG, England
关键词
structural equation modeling; auditory fMRI; model goodness of fit; intersubject variability; sparse temporal sampling;
D O I
10.1006/nimg.2001.0954
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Structural equation modeling (SEM) of neuroimaging data can be evaluated both for the goodness of fit of the model and for the strength of path coefficients (as an index of effective connectivity). SEM of auditory fMRI data is made difficult by the necessary sparse temporal sampling of the time series (to avoid contamination of auditory activation by the response to scanner noise) and by the paucity of well-defined anatomical information to constrain the functional model. We used SEM (i.e., a model incorporating latent variables) to investigate how well fMRI data in four adjacent cortical fields can be described as an auditory network. Seven of the 14 models (2 hemispheres x (6 subjects and I group)) produced a plausible description of the measured data. Since the auditory model to be tested is not fully validated by anatomical data, our approach requires that goodness of fit be confirmed to ensure generalizability of connectivity patterns. For good-fitting models, connectivity patterns varied significantly across subjects and were not replicable across stimulus conditions. SEM of central auditory function therefore appears to be highly sensitive to the voxel-selection procedure and/or the sampling of the time series. (C) 2001 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:1353 / 1360
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Bentler P M, 1992, Stat Methods Med Res, V1, P159, DOI 10.1177/096228029200100203
[2]  
Büchel C, 1999, SCIENCE, V283, P1538, DOI 10.1126/science.283.5407.1538
[3]   Modulation of connectivity in visual pathways by attention: Cortical interactions evaluated with structural equation modelling and fMRI [J].
Buchel, C ;
Friston, KJ .
CEREBRAL CORTEX, 1997, 7 (08) :768-778
[4]   How good is good enough in path analysis of fMRI data? [J].
Bullmore, ET ;
Horwitz, B ;
Honey, G ;
Brammer, M ;
Williams, S ;
Sharma, T .
NEUROIMAGE, 2000, 11 (04) :289-301
[5]   AUDITORY CORTICO-CORTICAL CONNECTIONS IN THE OWL MONKEY [J].
FITZPATRICK, KA ;
IMIG, TJ .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY, 1980, 192 (03) :589-610
[6]   CYTOARCHITECTONIC ORGANIZATION OF THE HUMAN AUDITORY-CORTEX [J].
GALABURDA, A ;
SANIDES, F .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY, 1980, 190 (03) :597-610
[7]  
Hackett TA, 1998, J COMP NEUROL, V394, P475, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19980518)394:4<475::AID-CNE6>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-Z
[9]  
Hall DA, 2000, MAGN RESON MED, V43, P601, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2594(200004)43:4<601::AID-MRM16>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-R