A prospective randomized study comparing nifedipine versus ritodrine for the suppression of preterm labour

被引:9
作者
Al-Qattan, F [1 ]
Omu, AE [1 ]
Labeeb, N [1 ]
机构
[1] Kuwait Univ, Fac Med, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Safat 13110, Kuwait
关键词
comparison; nifedipine; ritodrine; preterm contractions; inhibition;
D O I
10.1159/000054241
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Nifedipine is a dihydropyridine and a calcium channel blocker during the second phase of the action potential of uterine smooth muscle cells, and ritodrine is a beta -sympathomimetic. Objective of Study: To compare the efficacy and side-effects of oral nifedipine to ritodrine in the inhibition of preterm labour. Methodology: Sixty parturients admitted to the Maternity Hospital with preterm labour who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were randomized into two equal therapy groups: (a) oral nifedipine (n = 30) and (b) intravenous ritodrine (n = 30). During the period, the parturients were under continuous monitoring of fetal well-being, maternal uterine contractions, blood pressure, and pulse and respiratory rates. Both groups were given dexamethasone and followed up through delivery and the early neonatal period. Results: The incidence of preterm deliveries during the study period was 6.5%. Ritodrine had a quicker onset of inhibition of uterine contractions, especially between 20 and 40 min after initiation of tocolytic therapy (p < 0.04). Labour was delayed on the average for 40 h in the nifedipine group compared to 24 h in the ritodrine group (p < 0.05). Eighteen patients (60%) in the nifedipine group had cessation for more than 48 h compared to 7 (30.4%) in the ritodrine group (p < 0.05). Nifedipine inhibited uterine contractions for more than 7 days in more patients than ritodrine (13 versus 5, p < 0.05). Ten patients in the nifedipine. group went beyond 36 weeks of gestation compared to 4 in the ritodrine group (p < 0.03). In 5 (17.9%) of the ritodrine group compared to none in the nifedipine group, treatment was abandoned because of severe side-effects of nausea (11 versus 2, p < 0.01) and palpitations (16 versus 3, p < 0.004). There were no significant differences in the Apgar scores and neonatal morbidity. More infants in the ritodrine group (17, 73.9%) than in the nifedipine group (14, 46.1%, p < 0.05) were admitted to the neonatal unit. Conclusion: Nifedipine is recommended for aborting preterm contractions because it has fewer side-effects, superior efficacy and greater ease of administration than intravenous ritodrine. Copyright (C) 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel.
引用
收藏
页码:164 / 173
页数:10
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   High altitude and spontaneous preterm birth [J].
Ali, KZM ;
Ali, ME ;
Khalid, MEM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 1996, 54 (01) :11-15
[2]  
Altman DG, 1991, PRACTICAL STAT MED R, P455
[3]  
*AM COLL OBST GYN, 1995, TECHN B AM COLL OBST, V206, P1
[4]  
BACERO LA, 1991, AM J PERINAT, V8, P365
[5]  
BENEDETTI TJ, 1983, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V145, P1
[6]  
BEUKENS P, 1994, LANCET, V344, P841
[7]   PRETERM BIRTH PREVENTION - WHERE ARE WE [J].
CREASY, RK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1993, 168 (04) :1223-1230
[8]   A COMPARISON OF TOCOLYSIS WITH NIFEDIPINE OR RITODRINE - ANALYSIS OF EFFICACY AND MATERNAL, FETAL, AND NEONATAL OUTCOME [J].
FERGUSON, JE ;
DYSON, DC ;
SCHUTZ, T ;
STEVENSON, DK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1990, 163 (01) :105-111
[9]   NIFEDIPINE PHARMACOKINETICS DURING PRETERM LABOR TOCOLYSIS [J].
FERGUSON, JE ;
SCHUTZ, T ;
PERSHE, R ;
STEVENSON, DK ;
BLASCHKE, T .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1989, 161 (06) :1485-1490
[10]   EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF NIFEDIPINE VERSUS MAGNESIUM-SULFATE IN THE MANAGEMENT OF PRETERM LABOR - A RANDOMIZED STUDY [J].
GLOCK, JL ;
MORALES, WJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1993, 169 (04) :960-964