Hygienic Safety of a New Hydrodynamic Wound Debridement System

被引:9
作者
Daeschlein, Georg [1 ]
Lehnert, Wolfgang [1 ]
Arnold, Andreas [1 ]
Haase, Hermann [1 ]
Juenger, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Ernst Moritz Arndt Univ Greifswald, Dept Dermatol, D-17489 Greifswald, Germany
关键词
PULSED IRRIGATION; LAVAGE; HYDROSURGERY; PREVENTION; TOOL; JET;
D O I
10.1111/j.1524-4725.2010.01653.x
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100227 [皮肤病学];
摘要
BACKGROUND Unprotected hydrodynamic debridement can produce aerosols, with the risk of cross-contamination and infection for patients and medical staff. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the hygienic safety and the role of aerosol prevention of a pulsatile debridement. METHODS & MATERIALS Bacterial emissions during debridement of chronic ulcer wounds of seven patients using the Debri-Jet hydrodynamic in different modifications were analyzed. RESULTS Only a special aerosol prevention system (vacuum sensor, flexible cuff applicator) was able to effectively avoid the emission of infection relevant pathogens. The emitted pathogenic spectrum reflects the wound colonization of the individual patient wound; the most mobilized and emitted species were Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. CONCLUSION Unprotected pulsatile debridement can produce highly relevant bacterial emissions. Equipped with an elaborate aerosol prevention technique, the Debri-Jet is a hygienically safe and effective debridement system and poses no more hygienic risks than conventional debridement. Because even conventional nonhydrodynamic debridement can produce cross-contamination, basic hygienic precautions, including the wearing of masks, gloves, and eye-shield, and performance of the procedure by trained staff must be used during debridement.
引用
收藏
页码:1426 / 1438
页数:13
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]
Prevention of splashing during high-pressure irrigation of contaminated wounds [J].
Abouzahr, MK ;
Wider, TM .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1996, 98 (04) :751-752
[2]
Angobaldo J, 2008, WOUNDS, V20, P167
[3]
[Anonymous], 2009, OSTOMY WOUND MANAG, V55, P14
[4]
Wound microbiology and associated approaches to wound management [J].
Bowler, PG ;
Duerden, BI ;
Armstrong, DG .
CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY REVIEWS, 2001, 14 (02) :244-+
[5]
EVALUATION OF WOUND IRRIGATION BY PULSATILE JET AND CONVENTIONAL METHODS [J].
BROWN, LL ;
SHELTON, HT ;
BORNSIDE, GH ;
COHN, I .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1978, 187 (02) :170-173
[6]
A prospective randomised controlled clinical trial comparing hydrosurgery debridement with conventional surgical debridement in lower extremity ulcers [J].
Caputo, Wayne J. ;
Beggs, Donald J. ;
DeFede, Jessica L. ;
Simm, Lisa ;
Dharma, Hussein .
INTERNATIONAL WOUND JOURNAL, 2008, 5 (02) :288-294
[7]
A BARRIER TECHNIQUE FOR PULSED IRRIGATION OF CAVITARY WOUNDS [J].
CHERNOFSKY, MA ;
MURPHY, RX ;
JENNINGS, JF .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1993, 91 (02) :365-366
[8]
Dermal preservation using the Versajet® hydrosurgery system for debridement of paediatric burns [J].
Cubison, Tania C. S. ;
Pape, Sarah A. ;
Jeffery, Steven L. A. .
BURNS, 2006, 32 (06) :714-720
[9]
Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a high-powered parallel waterjet for wound debridement [J].
Granick, Mark S. ;
Posnett, John ;
Jacoby, Michael ;
Noruthun, Shyam ;
Ganchi, Parham A. ;
Datiashvili, Ramazi O. .
WOUND REPAIR AND REGENERATION, 2006, 14 (04) :394-397
[10]
Versajet® hydrosurgery in burn wound debridement:: A preliminary experience [J].
Gravante, G. ;
Esposito, G. ;
Di Fede, M. C. ;
Delogu, D. ;
Montone, A. .
BURNS, 2007, 33 (03) :401-402