Missing the forest: Further thoughts on the ethics of bystander risk in medical research

被引:20
作者
Kimmelman, Jonathan [1 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Biomed Eth Unit, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1017/S0963180107070648
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
[No abstract available]
引用
收藏
页码:483 / 490
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Kimmelman J., Medical research, risk and bystanders, IRB: Ethics and Human Research, 27, 4, pp. 1-6, (2005)
[2]  
The Declaration of Helsinki, (2004)
[3]  
The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research, (1978)
[4]  
Levine R.J., Ethics and Regulation of Clinical research, pp. 51-52, (1986)
[5]  
Veatch R.M., The ethics of research involving radiation, IRB: A Review of Human Subjects Research, 4, 1, pp. 3-5, (1982)
[6]  
Lingler J.H., Parker L.S., DeKosky S.T., Schulz R., Caregivers as subjects of clinical drug trials: A review of human subjects protection practices in published studies of Alzheimer's disease pharmacotherapies, IRB: A Review of Human Subjects Research, 28, pp. 11-18, (2006)
[7]  
Resnik D.B., Sharpe R.R., Protecting third parties in human subjects research, IRB: A Review of Human Subjects Research, 28, pp. 1-7, (2006)
[8]  
Holder A.R., Contraceptive research: Do sex partners have rights?, IRB: A Review of Human Subjects Research, 4, 2, pp. 6-7, (1982)
[9]  
Beckman R., The experimental housing allowance program, Journal of Housing, 30, (1973)
[10]  
Brown P.G., Informed consent in social experimentation, Ethical and Legal Issues of Social Experimentation, pp. 79-104, (1975)