Phase I trial of irinotecan plus temozolomide in adults with recurrent malignant glioma

被引:69
作者
Reardon, DA
Quinn, JA
Rich, JN
Desjardins, A
Vredenburgh, J
Gururangan, S
Sathornsumetee, S
Badruddoja, M
McLendon, R
Provenzale, J
Herndon, JE
Dowell, JM
Burkart, JL
Newton, HB
Friedman, AH
Friedman, HS
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Brain Tumor Ctr, Dept Surg, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Pediat, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[3] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Med, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[4] Duke Univ, Dept Pathol, Durham, NC USA
[5] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[6] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Canc Ctr Biostat, Durham, NC USA
[7] Ohio State Univ, Dept Neurol, Med Ctr, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
malignant glioma; topoisomerase; 1; inhibitors; DNA methylators; Phase I study;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.21316
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND. The authors determined the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of irinotecan (CPT-11), a topoisomerase I inhibitor, when administered with temozolomide among patients with recurrent malignant glioma (MG). METHODS. Patients with MG at any recurrence received temozolomide (TMZ) at a dose of 200 mg/m(2)/day on Days 1-5 plus CPT-11 administered as a 90-minute intravenous infusion during Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 5 of each 6-week cycle. Patients were stratified based on concurrent administration of CYP3A4-inducing anticonvulsants (enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs JELkEDs]). The CPT-11 dose was escalated in successive cohorts of patients independently for each stratum. RESULTS. CPT-11, at doses ranging from 40 mg/m(2) to 375 mg/m(2), was administered with TMZ to 107 patients. Ninety-one patients (85%) had recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and 16 (15%) had recurrent anaplastic glioma. Sixty-eight patients (64%) were given EIAEDs. The MTD of CPT-11 for patients concurrently receiving and not receiving EIAEDs was 325 mg/m(2) and 125 mg/m(2), respectively. The DLTs were hematologic, gastrointestinal, and hepatic. Fifteen patients (14%) achieved either a radiographic complete (n = 5) or partial (n = 10) response across a wide range of CPT-11 dose levels. Patients with recurrent GBM who achieved radiographic response had a median time to disease progression of 54.9 weeks. CONCLUSIONS. The current study built on preclinical observations designed to increase the clinical activity of topoisomerase I inhibitors. CPT-11, administered at full dose levels, was well tolerated in combination with TMZ. Furthermore, durable responses were observed in this recurrent population. Ongoing Phase 11 studies will evaluate the efficacy of this regimen and its application to other malignancies.
引用
收藏
页码:1478 / 1486
页数:9
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Phase 2 study of weekly irinotecan in adults with recurrent malignant glioma: Final report of NABTT 97-11 [J].
Batchelor, TT ;
Gilbert, MR ;
Supko, JG ;
Carson, KA ;
Nabors, LB ;
Grossman, SA ;
Lesser, GJ ;
Mikkelsen, T ;
Phuphanich, S .
NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2004, 6 (01) :21-27
[2]   A CONFIDENCE-INTERVAL FOR THE MEDIAN SURVIVAL-TIME [J].
BROOKMEYER, R ;
CROWLEY, J .
BIOMETRICS, 1982, 38 (01) :29-41
[3]   Two studies evaluating irinotecan treatment for recurrent malignant glioma using an every-3-week regimen [J].
Cloughesy, TF ;
Filka, E ;
Kuhn, J ;
Nelson, G ;
Kabbinavar, F ;
Friedman, H ;
Miller, LL ;
Elfring, GL .
CANCER, 2003, 97 (09) :2381-2386
[4]  
Friedman HS, 2002, MOL CANCER THER, V1, P943
[5]   Irinotecan therapy in adults with recurrent or progressive malignant glioma [J].
Friedman, HS ;
Petros, WP ;
Friedman, AH ;
Schaaf, LJ ;
Kerby, T ;
Lawyer, J ;
Parry, M ;
Houghton, PJ ;
Lovell, S ;
Rasheed, K ;
Cloughsey, T ;
Stewart, ES ;
Colvin, OM ;
Provenzale, JM ;
McLendon, RE ;
Bigner, DD ;
Cokgor, I ;
Haglund, M ;
Rich, J ;
Ashley, D ;
Malczyn, J ;
Elfring, GL ;
Miller, LL .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (05) :1516-1525
[6]   DNA mismatch repair and O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase analysis and response to temodal in newly diagnosed malignant glioma [J].
Friedman, HS ;
McLendon, RE ;
Kerby, T ;
Dugan, M ;
Bigner, SH ;
Henry, AJ ;
Ashley, DM ;
Krischer, J ;
Lovell, S ;
Rasheed, K ;
Marchev, F ;
Seman, AJ ;
Cokgor, I ;
Rich, J ;
Stewart, E ;
Colvin, OM ;
Provenzale, JM ;
Bigner, DD ;
Haglund, MM ;
Friedman, AH ;
Modrich, PL .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1998, 16 (12) :3851-3857
[7]   Phase III comparison of two irinotecan dosing regimens in second-line therapy of metastatic colorectal cancer [J].
Fuchs, CS ;
Moore, MR ;
Harker, G ;
Villa, L ;
Rinaldi, D ;
Hecht, JR .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (05) :807-814
[8]  
Gilbert MR, 2003, CLIN CANCER RES, V9, P2940
[9]   Temozolomide in combination with irinotecan for treatment of recurrent malignant glioma [J].
Gruber, ML ;
Buster, WP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2004, 27 (01) :33-38
[10]  
Houghton PJ, 2000, CLIN CANCER RES, V6, P4110