Modern management of vulvar cancer

被引:30
作者
de Hullu, JA
Oonk, MHM
van der Zee, AGJ
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Gynecol Oncol, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Groningen Hosp, Dept Gynecol Oncol, Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
lymph node metastases; morbidity; radiotherapy; recurrences; sentinel lymph node; vulvar cancer;
D O I
10.1097/00001703-200402000-00012
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Purpose of review The radical surgical approach in the treatment of vulvar cancer patients has led to a favourable prognosis for the majority of patients with early stage vulvar cancer. However, morbidity is impressive, leading to more individualized treatment. The authors have reviewed the most recent literature on the pros and cons of the modifications in treatment, including surgery and primary radiotherapy, for primary squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva and vulvar melanoma. Recent findings The sentinel lymph node procedure is a promising method of staging in patients with early stage squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva and possibly for patients with vulvar melanoma, but its safety still has to be proved. Less radical surgery has led to a higher local and regional recurrence rate. There may be a role for primary radiotherapy of the groin in a selected group of patients. Summary The authors have concluded that the individualization of treatment for vulvar cancer patients has led to a decrease in morbidity but an increase in recurrences. The increase in recurrences does not appear to compromise prognosis, probably because of the lack of power, based on the low incidence of vulvar cancer. The sentinel lymph node procedure and primary radiotherapy are promising methods to reduce the morbidity of treatment but their safety needs to be studied in randomized trials.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 72
页数:8
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]   The use of sonography in differentiating cervical lymphomatous lymph nodes from cervical lymph nodes [J].
Ahuja, A ;
Ying, M ;
Yang, WT ;
Evans, R ;
King, W ;
Metreweli, C .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 1996, 51 (03) :186-190
[2]  
ANDERSEN BL, 1983, OBSTET GYNECOL, V62, P457
[3]  
ANSINK A, 2002, COCHRANE LIB
[4]  
Ansink AC, 1999, CANCER, V86, P652, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19990815)86:4<652::AID-CNCR14>3.0.CO
[5]  
2-R
[6]   REGIONAL LYMPH-NODE RECURRENCE FOLLOWING LOCAL EXCISION FOR MICROINVASIVE VULVAR CARCINOMA [J].
ATAMDEDE, F ;
HOOGERLAND, D .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1989, 34 (01) :125-128
[7]   Risk of occult inguinofemoral lymph node metastasis from squamous carcinoma of the vulva [J].
Bosquet, JG ;
Kinney, WK ;
Russell, AH ;
Gaffey, TA ;
Magrina, JF ;
Podratz, KC .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2003, 57 (02) :419-424
[8]   The side of groin node metastases in unilateral vulvar carcinoma [J].
Burger, MPM ;
Hollema, H ;
Bouma, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 1996, 6 (04) :318-322
[9]   THE IMPORTANCE OF THE GROIN NODE STATUS FOR THE SURVIVAL OF T1 AND T2 VULVAR CARCINOMA PATIENTS [J].
BURGER, MPM ;
HOLLEMA, H ;
EMANUELS, AG ;
KRANS, M ;
PRAS, E ;
BOUMA, J .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1995, 57 (03) :327-334
[10]   SURGICAL THERAPY OF T1 AND T2 VULVAR CARCINOMA - FURTHER EXPERIENCE WITH RADICAL WIDE EXCISION AND SELECTIVE INGUINAL LYMPHADENECTOMY [J].
BURKE, TW ;
LEVENBACK, C ;
COLEMAN, RL ;
MORRIS, M ;
SILVA, EG ;
GERSHENSON, DM .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1995, 57 (02) :215-220