Sustainability assessment of low carbon technologies-case study of the building sector in China

被引:40
作者
Huang, Beijia [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Haizhen [1 ]
Mauerhofer, Volker [3 ]
Guo, Ru [1 ]
机构
[1] Tongji Univ, Coll Environm Sci & Technol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Tokyo Inst Technol, Dept Value & Decis Sci, Tokyo 152, Japan
[3] United Nations Univ, Inst Adv Studies, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
Sustainability assessment; Low carbon; Technology;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.03.031
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In order to meet the goals of GHG reduction and sustainability in industry development, strategies are needed that are reducing GHG emissions without compromising other economic, environmental and social priorities. In this paper, existing low carbon and sustainability requirements and evaluation methods are comparatively analyzed based on an in-depth literature review. Based on this analysis, multi-attributive assessment is selected as the methodological basis of our envisaged assessment framework; modified indicators and classified values are designed accordingly. The building sector in China is analyzed as a case study. Eleven main building energy saving technologies are assessed. The results show that under the sustainability criterion, the priority order of the assessed technologies is as follows: geothermal heat pump; solar thermal; solar PV; air conditioning energy saving; central heating system energy saving; building enclosure; lighting energy conservation; electric water heater energy saving, washing machine energy saving, refrigerator energy saving (these three have equal priority), and cooking appliance energy saving. The GHG and sustainability properties of technologies are discussed by comparing the indicator scores of the two aspects. The designed evaluation method can be used in regional cases if data resources are available; and for other sectors after indicator modification. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:244 / 250
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2009, UK LOW CARB TRANS PL
[2]  
[Anonymous], COMP GEOTHERMAL AIR
[3]  
[Anonymous], ASS IMP CHIN CDM PRO
[4]  
Azapagic A., 2000, T ICHEME B, V78
[5]  
Cai LH, COMPR BEN BUILD EN S
[6]   Cost-Benefit Analysis of In-Hospital Influenza Vaccination of Postpartum Women [J].
Ding, Yao ;
Zangwill, Kenneth M. ;
Hay, Joel W. ;
Allred, Norma J. ;
Yeh, Sylvia H. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 119 (02) :306-314
[7]   Regional, national, and spatially explicit scenarios of demographic and economic change based on SRES [J].
Gruebler, A. ;
O'Neill, B. ;
Riahi, K. ;
Chirkov, V. ;
Goujon, A. ;
Kolp, P. ;
Prommer, I. ;
Scherbov, S. ;
Slentoe, E. .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2007, 74 (07) :980-1029
[8]  
Han J. H, 2008, DEMONSTRATION ENERGY
[9]  
Hu X. L, 2001, GREEN HOUSE GAS EMIS
[10]  
International Labor Office European Union, 2011, GREEN BUILD SECT IS