Detection of neurocognitive feigning: development of a multi-strategy assessment

被引:29
作者
Bender, SD
Rogers, R
机构
[1] Univ Virginia, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Neurol, Charlottesville, VA 22908 USA
[2] Univ N Texas, Denton, TX 76203 USA
关键词
malingering; neuropsychology; strategies; cognitive;
D O I
10.1016/S0887-6177(02)00165-8
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Neuropsychological assessments can be completely invalidated by persons successfully feigning neurocognitive impairment. The current investigation examines via a research measure, the Test of Cognitive Abilities (TOCA), the usefulness of multiple detection strategies for the classification of neurocognitive feigning. Using a simulation design with a manipulation check, and both positive and negative incentives, two groups of simulators (Cautioned and NonCautioned) were compared with brain-injured patients and nonimpaired controls. Among detection strategies, Magnitude of Error (hit rate =.94) was highly effective, while Floor Effect (hit rate =.80) and Reaction Time (hit rate =.85) were moderately effective. When presented with complex strategies, the cautioning, of simulators did not improve their performances. (C) 2002 National Academy of Neuropsychology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 60
页数:12
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   MALINGERING RESPONSE STYLES ON THE MEMORY ASSESSMENT SCALES AND SYMPTOM VALIDITY TESTS [J].
BEETAR, JT ;
WILLIAMS, JM .
ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 10 (01) :57-72
[3]   ASSESSMENT OF MALINGERING AFTER MILD HEAD TRAUMA WITH THE PORTLAND DIGIT RECOGNITION TEST [J].
BINDER, LM .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 15 (02) :170-182
[4]   Malingering detection with the Dot Counting Test [J].
Binks, PG ;
Gouvier, WD ;
Waters, WF .
ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 12 (01) :41-46
[5]   Validation of a new technique to detect malingering of cognitive symptoms: The b Test [J].
Boone, KB ;
Lu, P ;
Sherman, D ;
Palmer, B ;
Back, C ;
Shamieh, E ;
Warner-Chacon, K ;
Berman, NG .
ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 15 (03) :227-241
[6]  
Conover WJ, 1999, PRACTICAL NONPARAMET, P3
[7]  
Franzen M D, 1996, Appl Neuropsychol, V3, P82, DOI 10.1207/s15324826an0302_6
[8]  
Frederick R. I., 1997, VALIDITY INDICATOR P
[9]  
Frederick R. I., 1991, Psychological Assessment, V3, P596, DOI [DOI 10.1037/1040-3590.3.4.596, https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.3.4.596]
[10]   A personal floor effect strategy to evaluate the validity of performance on memory tests [J].
Frederick, RI .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 22 (06) :720-730