Factors explaining the intention to give blood among the general population

被引:131
作者
Godin, G
Sheeran, P
Conner, M
Germain, M
Blondeau, D
Gagné, C
Beaulieu, D
Naccache, H
机构
[1] Univ Laval, Canada Res Chair Behav & Hlth, Quebec City, PQ G1K 7P4, Canada
[2] Univ Laval, Fac Sci Infirm, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[3] Univ Sheffield, Dept Psychol, Sheffield S10 2TN, S Yorkshire, England
[4] Univ Leeds, Inst Psychol Studies, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[5] Hema Quebec, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
关键词
attitude; blood donors; intention; moral norm; perceived control;
D O I
10.1111/j.1423-0410.2005.00674.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and Objectives The aim of this study was to identify factors explaining the intention to donate blood. Materials and Methods A random sample of 4000 respondents drawn from the general population received a questionnaire by mail. This questionnaire assessed variables as defined by the most prominent social cognitive theories. Results Overall, the respondents expressed a neutral mean level of intention to give blood in the next 6 months (2.84 on a five-point scale); 56.2% had never given blood in the past. The variables explaining 74% of the variance of intention were: perceived behavioural control (beta = 0.39; P < 0.001); factors facilitating taking action (beta = 0.25; P < 0.001); anticipated regret (beta = 0.16; P < 0.001); moral norm (beta = 0.11; P < 0.001); attitude (beta = 0.08; P < 0.01); level of education (beta = -0.03; P < 0.05); and past experience in giving blood (beta = 0.09; P < 0.001). Nonetheless, the predictive power of perceived behavioural control and moral norm was higher among the ever donors (both at P < 0.01) compared to the never donors, whereas the reverse was observed for attitude (P < 0.05). Conclusions People's intentions are mainly determined by perceived barriers and obstacles regarding blood donations. This suggests that promotional strategies should focus on the elimination of barriers to action as well as the development of a higher perception of control. Also, messages should be adapted to the targeted population, based on their previous blood donation behaviour (i.e. never donors vs. ever donors).
引用
收藏
页码:140 / 149
页数:10
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR [J].
AJZEN, I .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) :179-211
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1994, PREVENTING AIDS THEO
[3]   Social cognitive determinants of blood donation [J].
Armitage, CJ ;
Conner, M .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 31 (07) :1431-1457
[4]   Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review [J].
Armitage, CJ ;
Conner, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 40 :471-499
[8]   THE STRUCTURE AND ANTECEDENTS OF THE NORMATIVE AND ATTITUDINAL COMPONENTS OF FISHBEIN THEORY OF REASONED ACTION [J].
BURNKRANT, RE ;
PAGE, TJ .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1988, 24 (01) :66-87
[9]   HELPING-BEHAVIOR AS ROLE-BEHAVIOR - DISCLOSING SOCIAL-STRUCTURE AND HISTORY IN THE ANALYSIS OF PRO-SOCIAL ACTION [J].
CALLERO, PL ;
HOWARD, JA ;
PILIAVIN, JA .
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY, 1987, 50 (03) :247-256
[10]   A FOCUS THEORY OF NORMATIVE CONDUCT - RECYCLING THE CONCEPT OF NORMS TO REDUCE LITTERING IN PUBLIC PLACES [J].
CIALDINI, RB ;
RENO, RR ;
KALLGREN, CA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1990, 58 (06) :1015-1026