Paper-based versus computer-based assessment: is workload another test mode effect?

被引:61
作者
Noyes, J
Garland, K
Robbins, L
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Dept Expt Psychol, Bristol BS8 1TN, Avon, England
[2] Univ Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, Leics, England
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-8535.2004.00373.x
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 [教育学原理]; 120403 [教育经济与管理];
摘要
The key factors that influence paper-based and computer-based assessment of the academic performance of university students were discussed. The influences were classified as test mode effects. On an identical multiple-choice test, it was found that the group undertaking the assessment on computer outperformed the paper-based test group. The higher-attaining students benefited most from the computer-based assessment. The amount of cognitive workload associated with paper-based and computer-based tasks was another important factor which affected the mode of presentation.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 113
页数:3
相关论文
共 7 条
[1]
Battiste V., 1988, Proceedings of the Human Factors Society Annual Meeting, V32, P150, DOI [10.1177/154193128803200232, DOI 10.1177/154193128803200232]
[2]
Paper-based versus computer-based assessment: key factors associated with the test mode effect [J].
Clariana, R ;
Wallace, P .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 33 (05) :593-602
[3]
Hart S. G., 1988, HUMAN MENTAL WORKLOA, P5
[4]
COMPARISON OF 4 SUBJECTIVE WORKLOAD RATING-SCALES [J].
HILL, SG ;
IAVECCHIA, HP ;
BYERS, JC ;
BITTNER, AC ;
ZAKLAD, AL ;
CHRIST, RE .
HUMAN FACTORS, 1992, 34 (04) :429-439
[5]
Comprehension and workload differences for VDT and paper-based reading [J].
Mayes, DK ;
Sims, VK ;
Koonce, JM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ERGONOMICS, 2001, 28 (06) :367-378
[6]
VDT versus paper-based text: reply to Mayes, Sims and Koonce [J].
Noyes, JM ;
Garland, KJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ERGONOMICS, 2003, 31 (06) :411-423
[7]
THE ROLES OF IMMEDIACY AND REDUNDANCY IN RELATIVE SUBJECTIVE WORKLOAD ASSESSMENT [J].
TSANG, PS ;
VIDULICH, MA .
HUMAN FACTORS, 1994, 36 (03) :503-513