Comparison of steroid avoidance in tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus/sirolimus combination in kidney transplantation monitored by surveillance biopsy

被引:64
作者
Kumar, MSA
Heifets, M
Fyfe, B
Saaed, MI
Moritz, MJ
Parikh, MH
Kumar, A
机构
[1] Med Coll Penn & Hahnemann Univ, Div Transplantat, Philadelphia, PA 19102 USA
[2] Drexel Univ, Coll Med, Dept Surg & Transplantat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Drexel Univ, Coll Med, Dept Med & Nephrol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[4] Drexel Univ, Coll Med, Dept Pathol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
tacrolimus; steroid avoidance; mycophenolate mofetil; sirolimus; surveillance biopsy;
D O I
10.1097/01.tp.0000173378.28790.0b
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. Chronic steroid therapy in kidney transplantation has myriad side effects and steroid avoidance has become feasible. This prospective study compared the safety and efficacy of steroid avoidance in tacrolimus (TAC)/ mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and TAC/sirolimus (SRL) combinations in kidney transplantation. Methods. In all, 150 kidney recipients were analyzed: 75 each in TAC/MMF and TAC/SRL groups. The primary endpoint was acute rejection. Surveillance biopsies were completed to analyze subclinical acute rejection (SCAR) and chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN). Acute rejection and SCAR were treated by methylprednisolone. Two-year patient and graft survival, renal function, and adverse effects were monitored. Results. Acute rejection was seen in 12% of TAC/MMF and 8% of TAC/SRL patients. Two-year actuarial patient survival was 95% and 97%, and graft survival 90% and 90% in TAC/MMF and TAC/SRL groups, respectively. Surveillance biopsy showed cumulative incidence of SCAR was 27% in TAC/MMF and 16% in TAC/SRL groups at 2 years (P=0.04). Overall, 33% of recipients in TAC/MMF and 20% in TAC/SRL received methylprednisolone for acute rejection/SCAR. Moderate/severe CAN was 1.0% in TAC/SRL group and 22% in TAC/MMF group(P=0.06). New-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM) was 4% each in both groups. All recipients remain free of maintenance steroid therapy. Conclusions. Steroid avoidance in tacrolimus-based immunosuppression with MMF or SRL provides equivalent 2-year patient and graft survival with a low incidence of acute rejection and NODM. SCAR and CAN are lower in TAC/SRL compared to TAC/MMF group. The impact of decreased SCAR and CAN in TAC/SRL group on longer-term graft survival and function is to be evaluated.
引用
收藏
页码:807 / 814
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
American Diabetes Association, 2004, DIABETES CARE S1, V27, pS11, DOI DOI 10.2337/DIACARE.27.2007.S11
[2]   A randomized long-term trial of tacrolimus and sirolimus versus tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclosporine (Neoral) and sirolimus in renal transplantation. I. Drug interactions and rejection at one year [J].
Ciancio, G ;
Burke, GW ;
Gaynor, JJ ;
Mattiazzi, A ;
Roth, D ;
Kupin, W ;
Nicolas, M ;
Ruiz, P ;
Rosen, A ;
Miller, J .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 77 (02) :244-251
[3]  
FIRST MR, 1981, TRANSPLANT P, V13, P319
[4]  
FLECHNER SM, 2002, TRANSPLANTATION, V74, P1703
[5]  
Grimm P C, 1999, Pediatr Transplant, V3, P257, DOI 10.1034/j.1399-3046.1999.00044.x
[6]   Outcomes of African American kidney transplant recipients treated with sirolimus, tacrolimus, and corticosteroids [J].
Hricik, DE ;
Anton, HAS ;
Knauss, TC ;
Rodriguez, V ;
Seaman, D ;
Siegel, C ;
Valente, J ;
Schulak, JA .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2002, 74 (02) :189-193
[7]   Post-transplant diabetes mellitus - The role of immunosuppression [J].
Jindal, RM ;
Sidner, RA ;
Milgrom, ML .
DRUG SAFETY, 1997, 16 (04) :242-257
[8]   Immunosuppressive effects and safety of a sirolimus/cyclosporine combination regimen for renal transplantation [J].
Kahan, BD ;
Podbielski, J ;
Napoli, KL ;
Katz, SM ;
Meier-Kriesche, HU ;
Van Buren, CT .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1998, 66 (08) :1040-1046
[9]   Steroid avoidance in renal transplantation using basiliximab induction, cyclosporine-based immunosuppression and protocol biopsies [J].
Kumar, MSA ;
Xiao, SG ;
Fyfe, B ;
Sierka, D ;
Heifets, M ;
Moritz, MJ ;
Saeed, MI ;
Kumar, A .
CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 19 (01) :61-69
[10]  
Kumar MSA, 1998, TRANSPLANTATION, V65, P282