Comparison of 3-Dimensional Spinal Reconstruction Accuracy Biplanar Radiographs With EOS Versus Computed Tomography

被引:124
作者
Glaser, Diana A. [1 ,2 ]
Doan, Josh [1 ]
Newton, Peter O. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Orthoped Biomech Res Ctr, San Diego, CA 92123 USA
[2] Rady Childrens Hosp & Hlth Ctr, Dept Orthoped Surg, San Diego, CA USA
关键词
scoliosis; imaging; EOS; computed tomography (CT); 3D reconstructions; low radiation; biplanar slot-scanner; validation; accuracy; 3D RECONSTRUCTION; SCOLIOSIS; LORDOSIS; POINTS;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182518a15
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design: Experimental study for systematic evaluation of 3-dimensional (3D) reconstructions from low-dose digital stereoradiography. Objective. To assess the accuracy of EOS (EOS Imaging, Paris, France) 3-dimensional (3D) reconstructions compared with 3D computed tomography (CT) and the effect spine positioning within the EOS unit has on reconstruction accuracy. Summary of Background Data. Scoliosis is a 3D deformity, but 3D morphological analyses are still rare. A new low-dose radiation digital stereoradiography system (EOS) was previously evaluated for intra/interobserver variability, but data are limited for 3D reconstruction accuracy. Methods. Three synthetic scoliotic phantoms (T1-pelvis) were scanned in upright position at 0 degrees, +/- 5 degrees, and +/- 10 degrees of axial rotation within EOS and in supine position using CT. Three-dimensional EOS reconstructions were superimposed on corresponding 3D computed tomographic reconstructions. Shape, position, and orientation accuracy were assessed for each vertebra and the entire spine. Additional routine planer clinical deformity measurements were compared: Cobb angle, kyphosis, lordosis, and pelvic incidence. Results. Mean EOS vertebral body shape accuracy was 1.1 +/- 0.2 mm (maximum 4.7 mm), with 95% confidence interval of 1.7 mm. Different anatomical vertebral regions were modeled well with root-mean-square (RMS) values from 1.2 to 1.6 mm. Position and orientation accuracy of each vertebra were high: RMS offset was 1.2 mm (maximum 3.7 mm) and RMS axial rotation was 1.9 degrees (maximum 5.8 degrees). There was no significant difference in each of the analyzed parameters (P > 0.05) associated with varying the rotational position of the phantoms in EOS machine. Planer measurements accuracy was less than 1 degrees mean difference for pelvic incidence, Cobb angle (mean 1.6 degrees/maximum 3.9 degrees), and sagittal kyphosis (mean less than 1 degrees, maximum 4.9 degrees). Conclusion. The EOS image acquisition and reconstruction software provides accurate 3D spinal representations of scoliotic spinal deformities. The results of this study provide spinal deformity surgeons evidence pertaining to this new upright 3D imaging technology that may aid in the clinical diagnosis and decision making for patients with scoliosis.
引用
收藏
页码:1391 / 1397
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2001, SPINE, DOI DOI 10.1097/00007632-200106010-00003
[2]  
Carreau J, SPINE IN PRESS
[3]   A three-dimensional radiographic comparison of Cotrel-Dubousset and Colorado instrumentations for the correction of idiopathic scoliosis [J].
Delorme, S ;
Labelle, H ;
Aubin, CÉ ;
de Guise, JA ;
Rivard, CH ;
Poitras, B ;
Dansereau, J .
SPINE, 2000, 25 (02) :205-210
[4]   Diagnostic Imaging of Spinal Deformities Reducing Patients Radiation Dose With a New Slot-Scanning X-ray Imager [J].
Deschenes, Sylvain ;
Charron, Guy ;
Beaudoin, Gilles ;
Labelle, Hubert ;
Dubois, Josee ;
Miron, Marie-Claude ;
Parent, Stefan .
SPINE, 2010, 35 (09) :989-994
[5]  
GELB DE, 1995, SPINE, V20, P1351, DOI 10.1097/00007632-199506000-00005
[6]   Reliability of 3D reconstruction of the spine of mild scoliotic patients [J].
Gille, Olivier ;
Champain, Nicolas ;
Benchikh-El-Fegoun, Abdelkrim ;
Vital, Jean-Marc ;
Skalli, Wafa .
SPINE, 2007, 32 (05) :568-573
[7]  
GRAF H, 1983, REV CHIR ORTHOP, V69, P407
[8]   3D reconstruction of the spine from biplanar X-rays using parametric models based on transversal and longitudinal inferences [J].
Humbert, L. ;
De Guise, J. A. ;
Aubert, B. ;
Godbout, B. ;
Skalli, W. .
MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS, 2009, 31 (06) :681-687
[9]   Lumbopelvic lordosis and pelvic balance on repeated standing lateral radiographs of adult volunteers and untreated patients with constant low back pain [J].
Jackson, RP ;
Kanemura, T ;
Kawakami, N ;
Hales, C .
SPINE, 2000, 25 (05) :575-586
[10]  
Landry C, 1997, ANN CHIR, V51, P868