Three approaches to qualitative content analysis

被引:26122
作者
Hsieh, HF [1 ]
Shannon, SE
机构
[1] Fooyin Univ, Kaohsiung, Hsien, Taiwan
[2] Univ Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
content analysis; qualitative research; research methodology; end-of-life care;
D O I
10.1177/1049732305276687
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Content analysis is a widely used qualitative research technique. Rather than being a single method, current applications of content analysis show three distinct approaches: conventional, directed, or summative. All three approaches are used to interpret meaning from the content of text data and, hence, adhere to the naturalistic paradigm. The major differences among the approaches are coding schemes, origins of codes, and threats to trustworthiness. In conventional content analysis, coding categories are derived directly from the text data. With a directed approach, analysis starts with a theory or relevant research findings as guidance for initial codes. A summative content analysis involves counting and comparisons, usually of keywords or content,followed by the interpretation of the underlying context. The authors delineate analytic procedures specific to each approach and techniques addressing trustworthiness with hypothetical examples drawn from the area of end-of-life care.
引用
收藏
页码:1277 / 1288
页数:12
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Babbie E., 2016, PRACTICE SOCIAL RES
  • [2] BARCUS FE, 1959, THESIS U ILLINOIS UR
  • [3] Berelson Bernard., 1952, CONTENT ANAL COMMUNI
  • [4] Budd R.W., 1967, CONTENT ANAL COMMUNI
  • [5] Catanzaro M., 1988, Nursing research: Theory and practice, P437
  • [6] CAVAZOS EA, 1997, RICH JL TECH, V4, P3
  • [7] Curtis JR, 2001, J GEN INTERN MED, V16, P41
  • [8] Downe-Wamboldt B, 1992, Health Care Women Int, V13, P313
  • [9] Ferrell B, 1999, PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, V8, P500, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1611(199911/12)8:6<500::AID-PON411>3.0.CO
  • [10] 2-8