Why did US air pollution decline after 1970?

被引:20
作者
McKitrick, Ross [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Guelph, Dept Econ, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
关键词
pollution; growth; cointegration; clean air act; technology; ENVIRONMENTAL KUZNETS CURVE; FUEL-ECONOMY STANDARDS; UNIT ROOTS; EMISSIONS; GROWTH; QUALITY; POLICY; LIMITS; TESTS;
D O I
10.1007/s00181-006-0111-4
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
US economic growth and air pollution were decoupled after 1970. Possible explanations include regulation, oil price shocks, technology and income growth. This paper uses VAR analysis to show that the 1970 Clean Air Act (CAA) may have actually increased pollution in the short run but led to accelerated improvements in abatement technology. Gross domestic product and consumption growth had little direct effect while oil price increases caused small but significant emissions reductions. Recursive simulation shows that overall, the CAA, by accelerating improvements in abatement technology, reduced total emissions as of 1998 to 46% of what they would have been.
引用
收藏
页码:491 / 513
页数:23
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   The simple analytics of the environmental Kuznets curve [J].
Andreoni, J ;
Levinson, A .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2001, 80 (02) :269-286
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, NBER Working Paper. No.10557
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1993, Empirical Economics, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF01205413
[4]  
BIERANS H, 2003, EASYREG INT ECONOMET
[5]  
BRADFORD DF, 2000, 8001 NAT BUR EC RES
[6]   Nonparametric tests for unit roots and cointegration [J].
Breitung, J .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2002, 108 (02) :343-363
[7]   Factors behind the environmental Kuznets curve - A decomposition of the changes in air pollution [J].
Bruvoll, A ;
Medin, H .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2003, 24 (01) :27-48
[8]   POLICY WATCH - CORPORATE AVERAGE FUEL-ECONOMY STANDARDS [J].
CRANDALL, RW .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 1992, 6 (02) :171-180
[9]   Did the Clean Air Act cause the remarkable decline in sulfur dioxide concentrations? [J].
Greenstone, M .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2004, 47 (03) :585-611
[10]  
GROSSMAN G, 1995, Q J ECON, V3, P53