Complementary saphenous grafting: Long-term follow-up

被引:43
作者
Dion, R [1 ]
Glineur, D [1 ]
Derouck, D [1 ]
Verhelst, R [1 ]
Noirhomme, P [1 ]
El Khoury, G [1 ]
Degrave, E [1 ]
Hanet, C [1 ]
机构
[1] Clin Univ St Luc, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium
关键词
D O I
10.1067/mtc.2001.115419
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: Recently we reviewed the 10-year clinical and angiographic outcomes of sequential internal thoracic artery grafting. Most of the patients also received complementary saphenous grafts, and their overall long-term patency rates were surprisingly high. Therefore, we decided to analyze these results in more detail. Methods: The first consecutive 500 patients having received at least one sequential internal thoracic artery graft between October 1985 and August 1991 were restudied retrospectively. The saphenous grafts were only used to achieve complete revascularization in addition to complex arterial grafting on less significant or remote coronary vessels. A total of 161 patients consented to a late angiographic restudy at a mean postoperative interval of 7.5 years (1-12.2 years). Results: At 5 and 10 years postoperatively, freedom from angina was 96% and 82%, and freedom from any cardiac event was 92.8% and 69%, respectively. Only 15 (3.1%) patients needed additional revascularization. (0.3% per patient-year): 4 coronary artery bypass grafting (0.8%) and 11 percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (2.3%). The overall patency and intactness rates of saphenous anastomoses were 72.5% and 60.2%, respectively. There was a significant difference between the patency and intactness of sequential versus single anastomoses: 76% versus 60% and 64.5% versus 44.4%, respectively. There was no significant difference in either patency or intactness between right internal thoracic and Sequential saphenous grafts anastomosed to the right coronary artery: 83.4% versus 75.2% and 77.8% versus 62.4%, respectively. The same was true for the anastomoses to the "remote area" (distal circumflex, distal right coronary artery). Conclusions: Complementary sequential saphenous grafting still deserves consideration in some patients below 70 years of age, particularly for those with disease in the "remote area": the distal circumflex and right coronary branches.
引用
收藏
页码:296 / 304
页数:9
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   The radial artery for coronary artery bypass grafting: Clinical and angiographic results at five years [J].
Acar, C ;
Ramsheyi, A ;
Pagny, JY ;
Jebara, V ;
Barrier, P ;
Fabiani, JN ;
Deloche, H ;
Guermonprez, JL ;
Carpentier, A .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1998, 116 (06) :981-988
[2]   Use of the right gastroepiploic artery as a coronary artery bypass graft in 307 patients [J].
Albertini, A ;
Lochegnies, A ;
El Khoury, G ;
Verhelst, R ;
Noirhomme, P ;
Matta, A ;
Jacquet, L ;
Underwood, MJ ;
Dion, R .
CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1998, 6 (04) :419-423
[3]  
CAMPEAU L, 1983, CIRCULATION, V68, P1
[4]  
CHOW MST, 1994, CIRCULATION, V90, P129
[5]   Sequential vein bypass grafting: tactics and long-term results [J].
Christenson, JT ;
Simonet, F ;
Schmuziger, M .
CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1998, 6 (04) :389-397
[6]  
Christenson JT, 1997, ANN THORAC SURG, V63, P371
[7]   WHICH IS THE GRAFT OF CHOICE FOR THE RIGHT CORONARY AND POSTERIOR DESCENDING ARTERIES - COMPARISON OF THE RIGHT INTERNAL MAMMARY ARTERY AND THE RIGHT GASTROEPIPLOIC ARTERY [J].
DIETL, CA ;
BENOIT, CH ;
GILBERT, CL ;
WOODS, EL ;
PHARR, WF ;
BERKHEIMER, MD ;
MADIGAN, NP ;
MENAPACE, FJ .
CIRCULATION, 1995, 92 (09) :92-97
[8]  
DION R, 1989, J THORAC CARDIOV SUR, V98, P80
[9]   BILATERAL MAMMARY GRAFTING - CLINICAL, FUNCTIONAL AND ANGIOGRAPHIC ASSESSMENT IN 400 CONSECUTIVE PATIENTS [J].
DION, R ;
ETIENNE, PY ;
VERHELST, R ;
KHOURY, G ;
RUBAY, J ;
BETTENDORFF, P ;
HANET, C ;
WYNS, W .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 1993, 7 (06) :287-294
[10]   Long-term clinical and angiographic follow-up of sequential internal thoracic artery grafting [J].
Dion, R ;
Glineur, D ;
Derouck, D ;
Verhelst, R ;
Noirhomme, P ;
El Khoury, G ;
Degrave, E ;
Hanet, C .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2000, 17 (04) :407-414