Results of an Internet survey determining the most frequently used ankle scores by AOFAS members

被引:41
作者
Lau, JTC [1 ]
Mahomed, NM [1 ]
Schon, LC [1 ]
机构
[1] Union Mem Hosp, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
关键词
ankle arthritis; Internet; outcome; survey;
D O I
10.1177/107110070502600609
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: With technological advances in ankle arthroplasty, there has been parallel development in the outcome instruments used to assess the results of surgery. The literature recommends the use of valid, reliable, and responsive ankle scores, but the ankle scores commonly used in clinical practice remain undefined. Methods: An internet survey of members of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) was conducted to determine which three ankle scores they perceived as most commonly used in the literature, which ones they believe are validated, which ones they prefer, and which they use in practice. Results: According to respondents, the three most commonly used scores were the AOFAS Ankle score, the Foot Function Index (FFI), and the Musculoskeletal Outcomes Data Evaluation and Management System (MODEMS). The respondents believed that the AOFAS Ankle score, FFI, and MODEMS were validated. The FFI and MODEMS are validated, but the AOFAS ankle score is not validated. Conclusions: Most respondents preferred using the AOFAS Ankle score. The use of the empirical AOFAS Ankle score continues among AOFAS members.
引用
收藏
页码:479 / 482
页数:4
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
BELLAMY N, 1988, J RHEUMATOL, V15, P1833
[2]   Development and validation of a questionnaire designed to measure foot-health status [J].
Bennett, PJ ;
Patterson, C ;
Wearing, S ;
Baglioni, T .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PODIATRIC MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 88 (09) :419-428
[3]   THE FOOT FUNCTION INDEX - A MEASURE OF FOOT PAIN AND DISABILITY [J].
BUDIMANMAK, E ;
CONRAD, KJ ;
ROACH, KE .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1991, 44 (06) :561-570
[4]   NEW-JERSEY LOW CONTACT STRESS TOTAL ANKLE REPLACEMENT - BIOMECHANICAL RATIONALE AND REVIEW OF 23 CEMENTLESS CASES [J].
BUECHEL, FF ;
PAPPAS, MJ ;
IORIO, LJ .
FOOT & ANKLE, 1988, 8 (06) :279-290
[5]   PLANTAR FASCIOTOMY FOR INTRACTABLE PLANTAR FASCIITIS - CLINICAL-RESULTS AND BIOMECHANICAL EVALUATION [J].
DALY, PJ ;
KITAOKA, HB ;
CHAO, EYS .
FOOT & ANKLE, 1992, 13 (04) :188-195
[6]   Ankle osteoarthritis scale [J].
Domsic, RT ;
Saltzman, CL .
FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 1998, 19 (07) :466-471
[7]   A comparison of cigarette smokers recruited through the Internet or by mail [J].
Etter, JF ;
Perneger, TV .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2001, 30 (03) :521-525
[8]   Development and validation of a questionnaire to assess disabling foot pain [J].
Garrow, AP ;
Papageorgiou, AC ;
Silman, AJ ;
Thomas, E ;
Jayson, MIV ;
Macfarlane, GJ .
PAIN, 2000, 85 (1-2) :107-113
[9]  
GRUEN GS, 1991, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P15
[10]   Health surveys in the workplace: comparison of postal, email and World Wide Web methods [J].
Jones, R ;
Pitt, N .
OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE-OXFORD, 1999, 49 (08) :556-558