共 15 条
Self-report measures of individual differences in regulatory focus: A cautionary note
被引:156
作者:
Summerville, Amy
[1
]
Roese, Neal J.
[1
]
机构:
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Psychol, Champaign, IL 61820 USA
关键词:
approach;
avoidance;
regulatory focus;
affect;
motivation;
D O I:
10.1016/j.jrp.2007.05.005
中图分类号:
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号:
04 ;
0402 ;
摘要:
Regulatory focus theory distinguishes between two independent structures of strategic inclination, promotion versus prevention. However, the theory implies two potentially independent definitions of these inclinations, the self-guide versus the reference-point definitions. Two scales (the Regulatory Focus Questionnaire [Higgins, E. T., Friedman, R. S., Harlow, R. E., Idson, L. C., Ayduk, O. N., & Taylor, A. (2001). Achievement orientations from subjective histories of success: Promotion pride versus prevention pride. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 3-23] and the General Regulatory Focus Measure [Lockwood, P., Jordan, C. H., & Kunda, Z. (2002). Motivation by positive and negative role models: Regulatory focus determines who will best inspire us. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 854-864]) have been widely used to measure dispositional regulatory focus. We suggest that these two scales align respectively with the two definitions, and find that the two scales are largely uncorrelated. Both conceptual and methodological implications are discussed. (C) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:247 / 254
页数:8
相关论文