Development and Validation of a Dispatcher Identification Algorithm for Stroke Emergencies

被引:74
作者
Krebes, Sebastian [1 ]
Ebinger, Martin [1 ]
Baumann, Andre M. [2 ]
Kellner, Philipp A. [2 ]
Rozanski, Michal [1 ]
Doepp, Florian [3 ]
Sobesky, Jan [1 ]
Gensecke, Thomas [2 ]
Leidel, Bernd A. [4 ]
Malzahn, Uwe [1 ]
Wellwood, Ian [5 ]
Heuschmann, Peter U. [1 ,6 ]
Audebert, Heinrich J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Charite, Ctr Stroke Res, D-12200 Berlin, Germany
[2] Berlin Fire Brigade, Berlin, Germany
[3] Charite, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Dept Neurol, D-12200 Berlin, Germany
[4] Charite, Dept Emergency Med, D-12200 Berlin, Germany
[5] Kings Coll London, Dept Primary Care & Publ Hlth Sci, London WC2R 2LS, England
[6] Univ Wurzburg, Inst Clin Epidemiol & Biometry, D-97070 Wurzburg, Germany
关键词
algorithm; diagnostic accuracy; dispatch; sensitivity; specificity; stroke; MEDICAL DISPATCHERS; RECOGNITION; ACCURACY; TIME;
D O I
10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.634980
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Purpose-Recent innovations such as CT installation in ambulances may lead to earlier start of stroke-specific treatments. However, such technically complex mobile facilities require effective methods of correctly identifying patients before deployment. We aimed to develop and validate a new dispatcher identification algorithm for stroke emergencies. Methods-Dispatcher identification algorithm for stroke emergencies was informed by systematic qualitative analysis of the content of emergency calls to ambulance dispatchers for patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack (N=117) and other neurological (N=39) and nonneurological (N=51) diseases (Part A). After training of dispatchers, sensitivity and predictive values were determined prospectively in patients admitted to Charite hospitals by using the discharge diagnosis as reference standard (Part B). Results-Part A: Dysphasic/dysarthric symptoms (33%), unilateral symptoms (22%) and explicitly stated suspicion of stroke (47%) were typically identified in patients with stroke but infrequently in nonstroke cases (all < 10%). Convulsive symptoms (41%) were frequent in other neurological diseases but not strokes (3%). Pain (26%) and breathlessness (31%) were often expressed in nonneurological emergencies (6% and 7% in strokes). Part B: Between October 15 and December 16, 2010, 5774 patients were admitted by ambulance with 246 coded with final stroke diagnoses. Sensitivity of dispatcher identification algorithm for stroke emergencies for detecting stroke was 53.3% and positive predictive value was 47.8% for stroke and 59.1% for stroke and transient ischemic attack. Of all 275 patients with stroke dispatcher codes, 215 (78.5%) were confirmed with neurological diagnosis. Conclusions-Using dispatcher identification algorithm for stroke emergencies, more than half of all patients with stroke admitted by ambulance were correctly identified by dispatchers. Most false-positive stroke codes had other neurological diagnoses. (Stroke. 2012;43:776-781.)
引用
收藏
页码:776 / +
页数:8
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
Berlin SfUuG, 2010, CAS NUMB SEL HOSP AD
[2]   Paramedic identification of stroke: Community validation of the Melbourne Ambulance Stroke Screen [J].
Bray, JE ;
Martin, J ;
Cooper, G ;
Barger, B ;
Bernard, S ;
Bladin, C .
CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2005, 20 (01) :28-33
[3]   Dispatcher Recognition of Stroke Using the National Academy Medical Priority Dispatch System [J].
Buck, Brian H. ;
Starkman, Sidney ;
Eckstein, Marc ;
Kidwell, Chelsea S. ;
Haines, Jill ;
Huang, Rainy ;
Colby, Daniel ;
Saver, Jeffrey L. .
STROKE, 2009, 40 (06) :2027-2030
[4]   Compliance With and Use of Up-to-Date National Academies of Medical Dispatch Medical Priority Dispatch System Protocols in Dispatch Practice and Research Studies Must Be a Requirement [J].
Clawson, Jeff J. ;
Olola, Christopher H. O. ;
Scott, Greg .
STROKE, 2009, 40 (10) :E591-E592
[5]   Is ambulance telephone triage using advanced medical priority dispatch protocols able to identify patients with acute stroke correctly? [J].
Deakin, C. D. ;
Alasaad, M. ;
King, P. ;
Thompson, F. .
EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2009, 26 (06) :442-445
[6]  
Ellison Stefanie R, 2004, Mo Med, V101, P64
[7]   Mobile stroke unit for hyperacute stroke treatment [J].
Fassbender, K ;
Walter, S ;
Liu, Y ;
Muehlhauser, F ;
Ragoschke, A ;
Kuehl, S ;
Mielke, O .
STROKE, 2003, 34 (06) :E44-E44
[8]   Comparative Evaluation of Stroke Triage Algorithms for Emergency Medical Dispatchers (MeDS): Prospective Cohort Study Protocol [J].
Govindarajan, Prasanthi ;
Ghilarducci, David ;
McCulloch, Charles ;
Pierog, Jessica ;
Bloom, Evan ;
Johnston, Claiborne .
BMC NEUROLOGY, 2011, 11
[9]   Emergency calls in acute stroke [J].
Handschu, R ;
Poppe, R ;
Rauss, J ;
Neundörfer, B ;
Erbguth, F .
STROKE, 2003, 34 (04) :1005-1009
[10]   Diagnostic accuracy of stroke referrals from primary care, emergency room physicians, and ambulance staff using the face arm speech test [J].
Harbison, J ;
Hossain, O ;
Jenkinson, D ;
Davis, J ;
Louw, SJ ;
Ford, GA .
STROKE, 2003, 34 (01) :71-76