The economic impact of MELD on liver transplant centers

被引:70
作者
Axelrod, DA
Koffron, AJ
Baker, T
Al-Saden, P
Dixler, I
McNatt, G
Sumner, S
Vaci, M
Abecassis, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Dept Surg, Div Transplant Surg, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[2] Northwestern Mem Hosp, Kovler Transplant Ctr, Chicago, IL USA
关键词
disease severity; financial outcomes in transplantation; health economics; liver transplantation; MELD;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.01025.x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Adoption of the model for end stage liver disease (MELD) system prioritized patients awaiting liver transplant (LT) by severity of illness including progressive renal dysfunction. Unfortunately, current reimbursement for LT is not adjusted by severity of illness or need for simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation (LKT). This study examines hospital cost and reimbursement for LT and LKT to determine the effect of MELD on transplant center (TC) financial outcomes given current reimbursement practices as well as DRG outlier threshold limits. LT was performed for 86 adults prior to and 127 following the implementation of MELD. Between the eras, there was a substantial increase in the average laboratory MELD score (17.1 to 20.7 p = 0.004) and percentage of LKTs performed (5.8% to 17.3% p = 0.01). Increasing MELD score was associated with higher costs ($4309 per MELD point p < 0.001) and decreasing TC net income ($1512 per MELD point p < 0.001). In patients not achieving the Medicare outlier status, predicted net loss was $17 700 for high-MELD patients and $19 133 for those needing LKT. In conclusion, contractual reimbursement agreements that are not indexed by severity of disease may not reflect the increased costs resulting from the MELD system. Even with outlier thresholds, Medicare reimbursement is inadequate resulting in a net loss for the TC.
引用
收藏
页码:2297 / 2301
页数:5
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]   Trends in expenditures for medicare liver transplant recipients [J].
Best, JH ;
Veenstra, DL ;
Geppert, J .
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2001, 7 (10) :858-862
[2]   Improving liver allocation: MELD and PELD [J].
Freeman, RB ;
Wiesner, RH ;
Roberts, JP ;
McDiarmid, S ;
Dykstra, DM ;
Merion, RM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 4 :114-131
[3]   Preoperative factors associated with outcome and their impact on resource use in 1148 consecutive primary liver transplants [J].
Markmann, JF ;
Markmann, JW ;
Markmann, DA ;
Bacquerizo, A ;
Singer, J ;
Holt, CD ;
Gornbein, J ;
Yersiz, H ;
Morrissey, M ;
Lerner, SM ;
McDiarmid, SV ;
Busuttil, RW .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2001, 72 (06) :1113-1122
[4]   The survival benefit of liver transplantation [J].
Merion, RM ;
Schaubel, DE ;
Dykstra, DM ;
Freeman, RB ;
Port, FK ;
Wolfe, RA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 5 (02) :307-313
[5]   Summary report of a national conference: Evolving concepts in liver allocation in the MELD and PELD era [J].
Olthoff, KM ;
Brown, RS ;
Delmonico, FL ;
Freeman, RB ;
McDiarmid, SV ;
Merion, RM ;
Millis, JM ;
Roberts, JP ;
Shaked, A ;
Wiesner, RH ;
Lucey, MR .
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 10 (10) :A6-A22
[6]   Survival after liver transplantation in the United States: A disease-specific analysis of the UNOS database [J].
Roberts, MS ;
Angus, DC ;
Bryce, CL ;
Valenta, Z ;
Weissfeld, L .
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 10 (07) :886-897
[7]   Resource utilization in liver transplantation - Effects of patient characteristics and clinical practice [J].
Showstack, J ;
Katz, PP ;
Lake, JR ;
Brown, RS ;
Dudley, RA ;
Belle, S ;
Wiesner, RH ;
Zetterman, RK ;
Everhart, J .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 281 (15) :1381-1386
[8]   MELD scores of liver transplant recipients according to size of waiting list - Impact of organ allocation and patient outcomes [J].
Trotter, JF ;
Osgood, MJ .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 291 (15) :1871-1874