A model for disclosing the first trimester part of an integrated Down's syndrome screening test

被引:12
作者
Maymon, R [1 ]
Betser, M [1 ]
Dreazen, E [1 ]
Padoa, A [1 ]
Herman, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Assaf Harofeh Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, IL-70300 Zerifin, Israel
关键词
Down's syndrome; early disclosure; integrated test; screening; sequential screening;
D O I
10.1111/j.0009-9163.2004.00209.x
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
This study was designed to evaluate a model for disclosing the first part of an integrated Down's syndrome (DS) test without affecting its low false-positive results. Parturient women underwent sequential DS-screening tests. They included nuchal translucency (NT) and biochemistry assessments in the first trimester and a mid-gestation triple test. Although screening tests results were given following each test, fetal karyotyping was performed by means of mid-gestation amniocentesis. The proposed approach for disclosure refers to either (a) cases picked by a statistical model (this is based on a logistic regression analysis and a receiver-operated curve that was set to a specificity of 100% of first-trimester markers pointing on at very high probability of aneuploidy) or (b) cases demonstrating a first trimester DS risk greater than or equal to1 : 40 (a threshold level at which the integrated test results will always be screen positive). The results of the sequential screening and pregnancy outcome were available for 372 normal and 22 chromosomal affected singletons. NT and pregnancy-associated placental protein A emerged as the most sensitive marker combination. The statistical model picked up seven of 22 abnormal cases (32%), and a first-trimester DS risk greater than or equal to1 : 40 was detected in 11 (50%) (there was an overlap of five cases). The combined strategy yields a 60% detection rate (13/22) of the affected pregnancies and without any increase in the false-positive results. This can be achieved immediately following the first part of the integrated DS test. This model obviates the ethical, clinical, and financial implications of further assessing about 60% of the affected pregnancies.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 119
页数:7
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Screening for Down syndrome using first-trimester ultrasound and second-trimester maternal serum markers in a low-risk population: a prospective longitudinal study [J].
Audibert, F ;
Dommergues, M ;
Benattar, C ;
Taieb, J ;
Thalabard, JC ;
Frydman, R .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 18 (01) :26-31
[2]  
Bowes WS, 2000, OBSTET GYNECOL SURV, V55, pU1
[3]   Prenatal screening for Down's syndrome - A search for the family's values [J].
Copel, HA ;
Bahado-Singh, RO .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 341 (07) :521-522
[4]  
De Biasio P, 1999, PRENATAL DIAG, V19, P360, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0223(199904)19:4<360::AID-PD556>3.0.CO
[5]  
2-U
[6]  
de Graaf IM, 1999, PRENATAL DIAG, V19, P458, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0223(199905)19:5<458::AID-PD569>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-A
[8]   Screening for Down's syndrome: effects, safety, and cost effectiveness of first and second trimester strategies [J].
Gilbert, RE ;
Augood, C ;
Gupta, R ;
Ades, AE ;
Logan, S ;
Sculpher, M ;
van der Meulen, JHP .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 323 (7310) :423-425
[9]   Assessment of the value of reporting partial screening results in prenatal screening for Down syndrome [J].
Hackshaw, AK ;
Wald, NJ .
PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2001, 21 (09) :737-740
[10]   PREFERENCES OF PREGNANT-WOMEN FOR AMNIOCENTESIS OR CHORIONIC VILLUS SAMPLING FOR PRENATAL TESTING - COMPARISON OF PATIENTS CHOICES AND THOSE OF A DECISION-ANALYTIC MODEL [J].
HECKERLING, PS ;
VERP, MS ;
HADRO, TA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1994, 47 (11) :1215-1228