Status of cross-flow membrane emulsification and outlook for industrial application

被引:98
作者
Gijsbertsen-Abrahamse, AJ
van der Padt, A
Boom, RM
机构
[1] Univ Wageningen & Res Ctr, Food & Bioproc Engn Grp, NL-6700 EV Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Friesland Coberco Dairy Foods, Corp Res, NL-7400 AB Deventer, Netherlands
关键词
membrane morphology; industrial scale; membrane emulsification; flux; resistance;
D O I
10.1016/j.memsci.2003.11.006
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Cross-flow membrane emulsification has great potential to produce monodisperse emulsions and emulsions with shear sensitive components. However, until now, only low disperse phase fluxes were obtained. A low flux maybe a limiting factor for emulsion production on a commercial scale. Therefore, the effects of membrane parameters on the disperse phase flux are estimated. Besides, the effects of these parameters on the droplet size and droplet size distribution are qualitatively described. Wetting properties, pore size and porosity mainly determine the droplet size (distribution). Membrane morphology largely determines the disperse phase flux. As an example, industrial-scale production of culinary cream was chosen to evaluate the required membrane area of different types of membranes: an SPG membrane, an alpha-Al2O3 membrane and a microsieve. Due to the totally different morphologies of these membranes, the fraction of active pores is I for a microsieve and is very low for the other membranes. The choice of the optimal membrane did not depend on the production strategy: either to produce large quantities or to produce monodisperse emulsions, the best suitable was a microsieve with an area requirement of around I m(2). In general, the total membrane resistance should be low to obtain a large disperse phase flux. In contrast, the membrane resistance should be high to obtain monodisperse emulsions when using membranes with a high porosity. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 159
页数:11
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   Analysis of droplet formation and interactions during cross-flow membrane emulsification [J].
Abrahamse, AJ ;
van Lierop, R ;
van der Sman, RGM ;
van der Padt, A ;
Boom, RM .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2002, 204 (1-2) :125-137
[2]   Process fundamentals of membrane emulsification: Simulation with CFD [J].
Abrahamse, AJ ;
van der Padt, A ;
Boom, RM ;
de Heij, WBC .
AICHE JOURNAL, 2001, 47 (06) :1285-1291
[3]  
Adamson A.W., 1967, Physical chemistry of surfaces
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1992, KEY ENG MAT, DOI [DOI 10.4028/WWW.SCIENTIFIC.NET/KEM.61-62.513, 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.61-62.513]
[5]  
ARBUCKLE WS, 1986, ENCY FOOD ENG, P286
[6]  
BECHER DZ, 1985, ENCY EMULSION TECHNO
[7]  
BRENNAN JG, 1986, ENCY FOOD ENG, P288
[8]   Capillary mechanisms in membrane emulsification: oil-in-water emulsions stabilized by Tween 20 and milk proteins [J].
Christov, NC ;
Ganchev, DN ;
Vassileva, ND ;
Denkov, ND ;
Danov, KD ;
Kralchevsky, PA .
COLLOIDS AND SURFACES A-PHYSICOCHEMICAL AND ENGINEERING ASPECTS, 2002, 209 (01) :83-104
[9]   Membrane emulsification using sol-gel derived macroporous silica glass [J].
Fuchigami, T ;
Toki, M ;
Nakanishi, K .
JOURNAL OF SOL-GEL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 19 (1-3) :337-341
[10]   Influence of membrane morphology on pore activation in membrane emulsification [J].
Gijsbertsen-Abrahamse, AJ ;
van der Padt, A ;
Boom, RM .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2003, 217 (1-2) :141-150