A Triptych sectoral approach to burden differentiation; GHG emissions in the European bubble

被引:107
作者
Phylipsen, GJM
Bode, JW
Blok, K
Merkus, H
Metz, B
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Dept Sci Technol & Soc, NL-3584 CH Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Minist Housing Spatial Planning & Environm, NL-2500 GX The Hague, Netherlands
关键词
burden differentiation; sectoral approach; emission reductions;
D O I
10.1016/S0301-4215(98)00036-6
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
As Parties to the Climate Convention EU Member States have opted for a joint fulfilment of post-2000 greenhouse gas emission reduction obligations. No agreement could be reached on a joint EU target before the distribution of the burden of emission reductions among Member States had been agreed upon, This paper presents a sectoral approach to burden sharing, which incorporates important national circumstances. The three categories distinguished are the power sector, the internationally operating energy-intensive industry and the remaining domestically oriented sectors. Emission allowances are calculated by applying rules, such as a limitation of coal use for power production, minimum requirements for renewable energy, and minimum energy efficiency improvement rates in industry. For the domestic sectors a per capita emission allowance approach is used, The approach is applied to EU Member States to show the distribution of emission reductions for 2010. Also a comparison with other burden differentiation approaches is made, Results of the analysis played an important role in internal EU discussions, resulting in a better understanding among negotiators of differences in national circumstances and their role in emission levels, This improved understanding led to a political agreement on emission reduction targets that are substantially higher than targets Member States had been prepared to accept earlier. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:929 / 943
页数:15
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], GLOB CLIM CHANG EC D
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1989, GREENHOUSE EFFECT NE
[3]  
*BIE, 1995, GREENH GAS AB BURD S
[4]  
BLOK K, 1996, INF WORKSH EU AD HOC
[5]  
BLOK K, 1997, INF WORKSH EUR UN AD
[6]  
CAPROS P, 1995, ENERGY SCENARIOS 202
[7]  
CAPROS P, 1996, CO2 10 TARGET SCENAR
[8]  
*COP I, 1995, 1 SESS C PART FRAM C
[9]  
*COP II, 1996, 2 SESS C PART FRAM C
[10]  
*DAN ENV PROT AG, 1994, CLIM PROT DENM NAT R