Existence and determination of competitive equilibrium in unit commitment power pool auctions: Price setting and scheduling alternatives

被引:44
作者
Madrigal, M [1 ]
Quintana, VH
机构
[1] Inst Tecnol Morelia, Morelia, Michoacan, Mexico
[2] Univ Waterloo, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1109/59.932272
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 [电气工程]; 0809 [电子科学与技术];
摘要
The existence, determination and effects of competitive market equilibrium for unit commitment power pool auctions are investigated in this paper. When an equilibrium does not exist, under specific situations, conflictive multiple optimal primal solutions may exist. When an equilibrium exists, multiple primal solutions do not represent conflicts of interest, The existence or nonexistence of competitive equilibrium can be determined if the dual problem is solved to optimality, If equilibrium does not exist, there is excess supply at the optimal dual solution, which can be used to define priority orders and price setting alternatives to determine a final schedule, and avoid the conflicts of interest and revenue deficiency. Under disequilibrium, the optimal dual variables are not market clearing prices; a nonuniform pricing rule that avoids the flaws and complications of other pricing rules, such as maximum average cost and price minimization auctions, is proposed in the paper. The proposed scheduling and price-setting alternatives show that unit commitment models can be used in a market environment.
引用
收藏
页码:380 / 388
页数:9
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 1989, EXISTENCE OPTIMALITY
[2]
Benassy J. P., 1982, The Economics of Market Disequilibrium
[3]
BERTSEKAS DP, 1997, NONLINNEAR PROGRAMMI
[4]
Dekrajangpetch S, 1999, IEEE T POWER SYST, V14, P82, DOI 10.1109/59.744488
[5]
Elmaghraby W, 1999, ENERGY J, V20, P89
[6]
HAO S, 1998, IEEE T POWER SYSTEMS, V13, P368
[7]
Evaluation of a truthful revelation auction in the context of energy markets with nonconcave benefits [J].
Hobbs, BF ;
Rothkopf, MH ;
Hyde, LC ;
O'Neill, RP .
JOURNAL OF REGULATORY ECONOMICS, 2000, 18 (01) :5-32
[8]
Artificial power markets and unintended consequences [J].
Jacobs, JM .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 1997, 12 (02) :968-972
[9]
Johnson R. B., 1997, Utilities Policy, V6, P9, DOI 10.1016/S0957-1787(96)00009-4
[10]
An interior-point/cutting-plane method to solve unit commitment problems [J].
Madrigal, M ;
Quintana, VH .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2000, 15 (03) :1022-1027